Old 06-29-2012, 01:43 PM   #1
Graham2001
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Default Information wanted on Western Airlines flight 2605

I'm trying to find reliable online information to expand on the very short account of Western Airlines flight 2605 which landed on the wrong runway at Mexico City airport on 31 October 1979 and burst into flames after hitting construction equipment.

Wikipedia has a very short article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western...es_Flight_2605) which I would dearly like to expand.

As this accident involved a US carrier, was there an NTSB report?
Graham2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 05:35 PM   #2
9V-SJH
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 15
Default Accident description

See the following URL for info. on this tragedy:

http://aviation-safety.net/database/...?id=19791031-0
__________________
s.h./YEG
9V-SJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 05:58 PM   #3
Evan
Senior Member
 
Evan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,443
Default

It was a DGAC (Mexican) investigation. Don't have the report but the FAA provides this summary of the investigation:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FILE DATE LOCATION AIRCRAFT DATA INJURIES FLIGHT PILOT DATA
F S M/N PURPOSE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1-0026 79/10/31 MEXICO CITY,MEX DOUGLAS DC-10 CR- 11 0 2 SCHED INTERNATL PASSG SRV AIRLINE TRANSPORT, AGE
TIME - 0542 N903WA PX- 61 13 2 53, 31500 TOTAL HOURS,
DAMAGE-DESTROYED OT- 0 0 0 2248 IN TYPE, INSTRUMENT
RATED.
NAME OF AIRPORT - LICENCIADO BENITO
OPERATOR - WESTERN AIR LINES,INC.
DEPARTURE POINT INTENDED DESTINATION
LOS ANGELES,CA MEXICO CITY,MEX
TYPE OF ACCIDENT PHASE OF OPERATION
COLLIDED WITH: AUTOMOBILE LANDING: GO-AROUND
PROBABLE CAUSE(S)
PILOT IN COMMAND - IMPROPER IFR OPERATION
PILOT IN COMMAND - FAILED TO FOLLOW APPROVED PROCEDURES,DIRECTIVES,ETC.
MISCELLANEOUS ACTS,CONDITIONS - RUNWAY CLOSED
FIRE AFTER IMPACT
REMARKS- INVEST & REPORTED BY GOVT OF MEX.RWY 23R ASSIGNED,INITIAL T/D OFF 23L.HIT TRUCK.WX-FOG.
Evan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 06:54 PM   #4
Gabriel
Senior Member
 
Gabriel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Buenos Aires - Argentina
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9V-SJH View Post
See the following URL for info. on this tragedy:

http://aviation-safety.net/database/...?id=19791031-0
I don't know the details, but from what's in that link, it was not just simply a landing in the wrong runway. Key points:
- The plane was cleared to land on 27R
- Apparently (given the NTSB recommendations shown there) it was a sidestep approach, meaning that the plane was supposed to do an instrument approach to 27L and, when in visual contact with the runway, make a side step to 27R.
- The airplane descended in fog busting the approach minimums of 600ft (that is a high minimum for a regular instrument approach, but not for a sidestep approach).
- The airplane touched down with the left main gear on the grass and the right one on the runway's shoulder.
- One of the NTSB recommendation was to publish separate approach plates for sidestep approaches.
- The tower warned the flight three times about the closed runway (according to a link in the wikipedia article).

(Note, the NTSB must have been an invited party in the investigation for being US the country of the operator, of the manufacturer and of registration of the airplane)
Gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 10:52 PM   #5
3WE
Senior Member
 
3WE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,968
Default

I think there's a CVR on Airdisaster.com. It might be fake, but then with it being a non-US crash, it might have leaked out?

In listening to it, there is confusion in the cockpit about what approach they are on versus what runway they are cleared to land on.

Classic case of a little confusion, but 'deciding' that everyting is OK because "how could things go wrong- every other approach I've ever done in my life worked out ok"
__________________
Chief Instructor, Sweet Monkey River Flight School, Del Norte.
Learn to Fly your Favorite Flight Simulator Game! Takeoff, Land, Fly on Instruments! Be ready when the flight crew gets food poisoning!
Call 1-800-BR-549...classes starting now!
3WE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 10:53 PM   #6
orangehuggy
Member
 
orangehuggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 300
Default

The most comprehensive description and analysis by far is in the December 1983 issue of Flying magazine pages 100 to 107.
http://books.google.com/books?id=8BV...page&q&f=false
Cheers!
__________________
moving quickly in air
orangehuggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 10:56 PM   #7
3WE
Senior Member
 
3WE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
I don't know the details...
It was a DC-10.

Care to speculate if that stiff connection between the gear and the wing might have affected the beak up some. (I know of a DC-9 that hit a truck and everyone lived).
__________________
Chief Instructor, Sweet Monkey River Flight School, Del Norte.
Learn to Fly your Favorite Flight Simulator Game! Takeoff, Land, Fly on Instruments! Be ready when the flight crew gets food poisoning!
Call 1-800-BR-549...classes starting now!
3WE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 10:58 PM   #8
3WE
Senior Member
 
3WE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangehuggy View Post
The most comprehensive description and analysis by far is in the December 1983 issue of Flying magazine pages 100 to 107.
http://books.google.com/books?id=8BV...page&q&f=false
Cheers!
Len Morgan
Gordon Baxter
__________________
Chief Instructor, Sweet Monkey River Flight School, Del Norte.
Learn to Fly your Favorite Flight Simulator Game! Takeoff, Land, Fly on Instruments! Be ready when the flight crew gets food poisoning!
Call 1-800-BR-549...classes starting now!
3WE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 12:03 AM   #9
Graham2001
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3WE View Post
I think there's a CVR on Airdisaster.com. It might be fake, but then with it being a non-US crash, it might have leaked out?

In listening to it, there is confusion in the cockpit about what approach they are on versus what runway they are cleared to land on.

Classic case of a little confusion, but 'deciding' that everyting is OK because "how could things go wrong- every other approach I've ever done in my life worked out ok"
I've looked and the transcript does not appear to be there. Some further websearching bought up a note to the effect that it had been removed.

I found an earlier discussion (from 2005) on another fourm

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-fo...d.main/130485/

But also a rather frustrating item from a news archive site, which implies that portions of the ATC conversation were included in news broadcasts & that the CVRs went to the US.

http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/program.pl?ID=57025
Graham2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 01:35 AM   #10
bob m
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
Default

I recall hearing the CVR on this one years ago, a difficult one in its last monent, still huants me to this day, very sad.
bob m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 03:59 AM   #11
Gabriel
Senior Member
 
Gabriel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Buenos Aires - Argentina
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3WE View Post
It was a DC-10.

Care to speculate if that stiff connection between the gear and the wing might have affected the beak up some. (I know of a DC-9 that hit a truck and everyone lived).
From the Flying article, it seems to have kept both wings after the hard touchdown.
Gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 08:02 AM   #12
Graham2001
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Default

Another piece of frustration. Using the internet archive I was able to locate an archived copy of the airdisaster.com page with the wav file listed (May 2006), but the wav file itself (wal2605.wav) had not been archived.

I also used it to open a geocities page linked to off the aviation-safety.net page which points to a vanity press book written by someone claiming to have been a member of Western Airline 2605s cabin crew and who seems to have been pushing some kind of conspiracy theory from what's on the site.

http://web.archive.org/web/200910220.../blackbox.html

There's a placeholder where he claims to have the full cvr transcripts and that he's going to post them 'soon'

Also found another discussion of the recording:

http://www.diecastaircraftforum.com/...-tapes-cd.html

And something that appears to quote from contemporary press accounts:

http://www.taxiways.de/DC-10/accident/N903WA.html
Graham2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 10:44 AM   #13
Peter Kesternich
Senior Member
 
Peter Kesternich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,069



Default

You can also try to find a copy of David Grayson '"Terror in the Skies", published by W.H.Allen (London, England, 1989), which has a chapter dealing with that particular accident.
__________________








Peter Kesternich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 11:38 AM   #14
TheKiecker
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 193
Send a message via AIM to TheKiecker Send a message via Yahoo to TheKiecker
Default

Wow!! When I first started reading the links, I thought they were just to the left of 23R. I had to read it again to make clear they were to the left of 23L also!!

Even if 23L was open they would have had their hands full.

This is an unbelievable screw teh pooch disaster.

What I dont get from that Flying article is which runway was lit.
TheKiecker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 12:31 PM   #15
Evan
Senior Member
 
Evan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKiecker View Post
Wow!! When I first started reading the links, I thought they were just to the left of 23R. I had to read it again to make clear they were to the left of 23L also!!

Even if 23L was open they would have had their hands full.

This is an unbelievable screw teh pooch disaster.

What I dont get from that Flying article is which runway was lit.
The article says 23L was lit.

It seems crazy for the field to have been using a localizer on a runway with heavy equipment moving around, as they would create signal distortions. Perhaps this is why they landed left of the runway. But then the pilots also acknowledged that they were a bit left of track. There's no question that this was pilot error, as they should never have continued the approach when they became confused (and low on the glideslope). The question in my mind is whether this was an error in continuing an unstable approach on purpose or a failed a go-around attempt. Although key parts of the CVR are missing, it seems to me like it could have been the latter.
Evan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 02:56 PM   #16
TheKiecker
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 193
Send a message via AIM to TheKiecker Send a message via Yahoo to TheKiecker
Default

Do you garner from that article that 23L was lit and 23R was not?

Was 23L lit with work lights? Or just with standard runway lights?

The holes in this story/report are amazingly glaring. Thank goodness there were no Polish VIP's on it.

TheKiecker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 04:53 PM   #17
Gabriel
Senior Member
 
Gabriel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Buenos Aires - Argentina
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan View Post
The article says 23L was lit.

It seems crazy for the field to have been using a localizer on a runway with heavy equipment moving around, as they would create signal distortions. Perhaps this is why they landed left of the runway. But then the pilots also acknowledged that they were a bit left of track. There's no question that this was pilot error, as they should never have continued the approach when they became confused (and low on the glideslope). The question in my mind is whether this was an error in continuing an unstable approach on purpose or a failed a go-around attempt. Although key parts of the CVR are missing, it seems to me like it could have been the latter.
They had not advanced the throttles by when they hit the runway (well, the unpaved shoulder).

It's not just like they busted the minimums of 600ft, they descended all the way to the ground without seeing anything and without calling the altitudes.
Gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 06:55 PM   #18
Evan
Senior Member
 
Evan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKiecker View Post
Do you garner from that article that 23L was lit and 23R was not?

Was 23L lit with work lights? Or just with standard runway lights?

The holes in this story/report are amazingly glaring. Thank goodness there were no Polish VIP's on it.

The controllers says,"Approach lights are on 23 left, but that runway is closed to traffic".

Speaking of conspiracy, what seems a bit odd is that the original tower recordings were never released, only a transcript and on the transcript, when the tower clearly indicates that 23L is closed, the readback on the CVR does not mention this. I think there is one other instance of this in there. So the readbacks don't match the tower remarks. Of course, this could simply be due to fatigue and/or poor discipline, but it makes you wonder...
Evan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 07:28 AM   #19
Graham2001
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kesternich View Post
You can also try to find a copy of David Grayson '"Terror in the Skies", published by W.H.Allen (London, England, 1989), which has a chapter dealing with that particular accident.
I've managed to find a copy in an Op-shop, just had a quick look, seems to be quoting the ATC transcript only. Not happy that he does not give sources.

Especially after locating another message board thread that hints at possible CRM problems. (Reply 22 by MAV75)

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-fo...d.main/174717/
Graham2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright JetPhotos.Net 2003-2011