Old 02-23-2012, 02:12 PM   #1
burnsy133
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Default Trying ever so hard !!

Hi People,

A few years back i bought all the gear ...Cannon this Cannon that, stabalised the whole works, I then spent a small fortune on Photoshop but to no avail, every picture submitted came back rejected, it got to me that much that I eventually sold the lot and went back to just taking numbers. Now years down the line and a tad wiser i have again spent a small fortune (+£5000) on camera equipment, I learnt more about ISO, F stops the lot, went on courses etc etc. Just lately I bought myself a top of the range iMac and went on courses on how to use Appature etc etc, still remembering the disspointment of rejected shot in the past i used one of these lessons to get the apple teacher to read the upload guidelines of JP.net and had him work on a picture of mine, submitted it and hey presto...rejected. This time i am not giving up, the screeners tell me that the picture isnt sharp enough, but i cant see it, how much sharp should i apply ?, how much is too much ?, the guy from the apple store says it is perfectly sharp...me...im confused. Any help greatfully recieved.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3757219

Help !!!
burnsy133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 02:55 PM   #2
B7772ADL
JetPhotos.Net Crew
 
B7772ADL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom.
Posts: 2,482



Send a message via MSN to B7772ADL
Default

It really does appear quite soft and could be sharpened plenty more. It's also too low in the frame and there appears to be a dust spot in the lower left. Might be worth while you posting the original file so that some of us can try editing it up to database standards for you so you can see what it should look like.

Also just had a quick peak at your exif settings. Aperture priority is a good start, most people usually set it to around f8 though rather than f10. More concerning with regards to acceptance is your iso setting which is set to 400. I'm not sure how well your Sony handles noise but iso 400 on Canon cameras is just asking for a noisy background. On a nice sunny day such as that you were shooting on I'd be looking more at iso100/200. Typically in good sunny weather I'm aiming for iso 100, f8, 1/500th or thereabouts.
__________________

Last edited by B7772ADL; 02-23-2012 at 03:03 PM.
B7772ADL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 03:52 PM   #3
Kevin
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: La Jolla - KSAN
Posts: 219
Default

Been uploading for 7 years now, started off with a point and shoot and now with an Canon EOS camera and L lens, I can tell you it it certainly takes more than what you have to get your shots accepted. Of course, equipments play a role, but the remaining factors to getting your shots in depend on yourself.

Keep trying and seeking help is a good way to get it all straightened up, I am sure you'll get some of them in eventually!
Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 04:14 PM   #4
burnsy133
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Default

Sorry Kevin I don't follow,

What do you mean by saying "It takes a lot more than what I have got " ???
burnsy133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 04:55 PM   #5
Simpleboy
JetPhotos.Net Crew
 
Simpleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,068



Default

You need more experience.

You cant just buy expensive stuff and expect it to work.

If you're shooting JPEG and the sony system is anything like the Canon/Nikon system you want to be shooting ISO 160, if RAW (or sony's equivalent) ISO 100 or 200.
__________________
Sam Rudge
A 5D3, some Canon lenses, the Sigma L and a flash
Simpleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 05:43 PM   #6
burnsy133
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpleboy View Post
You need more experience.

You cant just buy expensive stuff and expect it to work.

If you're shooting JPEG and the sony system is anything like the Canon/Nikon system you want to be shooting ISO 160, if RAW (or sony's equivalent) ISO 100 or 200.
Thanks for that, i am aware that I cannot buy experience which is why this time i have approached the forums, taken classes etc etc, see where i have gone wrong here, was shooting in terrible conditions in Zurich with the ISO set to 400, for some reason i have not changed it back

I have had a go at changing things...how does this look now ??

http://www.flickr.com/photos/77263765@N06/6777730992/
burnsy133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 06:15 PM   #7
Simpleboy
JetPhotos.Net Crew
 
Simpleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,068



Default

It's still soft/blurry.
Are you shooting RAW or JPEG?
__________________
Sam Rudge
A 5D3, some Canon lenses, the Sigma L and a flash
Simpleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 06:19 PM   #8
burnsy133
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpleboy View Post
It's still soft/blurry.
Are you shooting RAW or JPEG?
I shoot RAW

Ta

Rob
burnsy133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 06:42 PM   #9
Simpleboy
JetPhotos.Net Crew
 
Simpleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,068



Default

When converting to TIFF or JPEG are you doing any sharpening? It makes a world of a difference if you do it correctly.
__________________
Sam Rudge
A 5D3, some Canon lenses, the Sigma L and a flash
Simpleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 07:19 PM   #10
PMN
Resident Photo Geek
 
PMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bradford, UK
Posts: 2,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnsy133 View Post
i used one of these lessons to get the apple teacher to read the upload guidelines of JP.net and had him work on a picture of mine, submitted it and hey presto...rejected.
Just purely out of curiosity, why did you think he'd know or be able to understand the acceptance criteria for JP? He teaches people how to use a program, he's not necessarily even going to be a decent photographer!

One quick point and one that's all too regularly overlooked, with digital images sharpness and contrast are very closely related; the less contrast an image has generally the softer it will naturally look so it's essential to nail the exposure and edit to give a nice contrasty image if you want the sharpness to really pop out. Here's your original reject first and a slightly tweaked version, the tweaked one has simply been given a kick of contrast but it already looks sharper, even though absolutely no sharpness has been added.





If you work on nailing the exposure and contrast first you'll have a hugely easier time getting the sharpening right.
__________________
Seeing the world with a 3:2 aspect ratio...

My images on Flickr
PMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 08:29 AM   #11
burnsy133
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpleboy View Post
When converting to TIFF or JPEG are you doing any sharpening? It makes a world of a difference if you do it correctly.

Obviously not enough !!!, I have been processing the Raw image and then exporting to a file as a jpeg.

Whilst on the subject of processing, I notice that there are a few guidelines for processing with PS, are there any giving guidence for using an iMac and Aperture 3 ???

Thanks for all the help people.
burnsy133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2012, 03:54 AM   #12
Kevin
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: La Jolla - KSAN
Posts: 219
Default

Hi we could try giving it a shot if you post the original on here...
Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright JetPhotos.Net 2003-2011