Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pilots Nodded Off Before Landing?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pilots Nodded Off Before Landing?

    Pilots of a Northwest Airlines flight approaching Minneapolis International Airport Wednesday night temporarily lost radio contact with air-traffic controllers and apparently overshot their destination by about 100 miles.

    The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the incident as a possible case of pilots nodding off at the controls, according to government and industry officials familiar with the matter.

    Controllers were able to re-establish contact with the Airbus A320, these people said, and the plane eventually landed safely without injuries. The plane was en route from San Diego to Minneapolis. Details are still emerging and the safety board is expected to release some information later Thursday. But based on preliminary indications, industry and government officials believe the crew may have briefly fallen asleep, flown past the airport, and then circled back to land.
    Source and full story.

  • #2
    This one smells like a major spanking coming.

    Comment


    • #3
      this makes no sense to me whatsoever. the article states that they were at cruising altitude of 37k and contact was lost for 78 minutes. my assumption is that they were traveling at cruising speed of a minimum of 500 mph. that would mean that they flew for roughly 1/3 of the distance without answering their radios or checking in at waypoints???

      sounds like crap to me. i don't know much about this stuff but i would venture a guess that some f-16's or other interceptors would have paid the flight crew an up close visit.

      78 minutes of no response while flying over the CONUS? hmmmm

      Comment


      • #4
        What about some communication malfunction ?, probably they were on the wrong frequencies !!
        A Former Airdisaster.Com Forum (senior member)....

        Comment


        • #5
          The pilots alleged excuse sounds more lamebrain than the alleged unofficial preliminary authorities suggestion that they fell to sleep.


          The pilots of a Northwest Airlines jetliner told authorities they got into a heated argument over airline policies – and ended up overflying their destination of Minneapolis by 150 miles on Wednesday.
          (sounds like some of the disturbing alleged pilots on this message board. Perhaps I should say more like former members. Banned.)
          Source and full story
          http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news...in_argume.html
          they were in a heated discussion over airline policy and they lost situational awareness
          Source and full story
          Pilots, en route from San Diego to Minneapolis, did not respond to communications from controllers, the National Transportation Safety Board said.

          flight 188


          Originally posted by AVION1 View Post
          What about some communication malfunction ?, probably they were on the wrong frequencies !!
          I would be skeptical of that. Wouldn't that require all the radios to be on the wrong frequencies? Don't airliners typically have multiple radios on multiple frequencies? Wouldn't that mean that they would've had their emergency radio shutdown or on the wrong frequency also? Sounds unlikely.

          Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
          i would venture a guess that some f-16's or other interceptors would have paid the flight crew an up close visit.
          Military fighter jets in two locations were on alert after communication was lost with the NWA plane. Pilots were in the jets on the tarmacs, fueled up and waiting for orders
          Source and full story
          Minneapolis-St. Paul news, Minnesota weather, traffic and sports from FOX 9, serving the Twin Cities metro, Greater Minnesota and western Wisconsin. Official home of Minnesota Vikings football. Get Minnesota breaking news updates and stream FOX 9 live.

          Comment


          • #6
            another reason to place automation on board. say they really did nod off into deep sleep fo so long that the plane was in danger of running out of fuel. since i don't believe they can call FA's in the back from the ground, which post 9-11 is useless anyway, several hundred people would die.

            now, if you could assume control over the plane from the ground, you could land it and beat the crap out of the two sleepy head pilots before firing them and stripping their licenses.

            oversimplified? of course! but i'm just sayin....

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
              they can call FA's in the back from the ground, which post 9-11 is useless anyway
              You can still kick and punch the cockpit door. Sire, it won't open. But it will still make noise like hell.

              --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
              --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
                Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
                since i don't believe they can call FA's in the back from the ground, which post 9-11 is useless anyway
                You can still kick and punch the cockpit door. Sire, it won't open. But it will still make noise like hell.
                Allegedly.
                The pilots didn't become aware of their situation until a flight attendant contacted them through an intercom from the cabin to the cockpit, said a source familiar with the investigation who wasn't authorized to speak publicly and asked not to be named.
                Source and full story (AP)


                A320s are equipped with a phone-like device that airline dispatchers can use to contact the crew, said Shirley Phillips, a former simulator instructor for US Airways who has flown the A320.

                "It's fairly loud," she said. "There's lots of whistles and bells and things in the Airbus that all signify different things, but it has a pretty distinctive sound to it. I wouldn't say that you would mistake it for anything else.
                Source and full story.


                NTSB Advisory

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
                  another reason to place automation on board. say they really did nod off into deep sleep fo so long that the plane was in danger of running out of fuel. since i don't believe they can call FA's in the back from the ground, which post 9-11 is useless anyway, several hundred people would die.

                  now, if you could assume control over the plane from the ground, you could land it and beat the crap out of the two sleepy head pilots before firing them and stripping their licenses.

                  oversimplified? of course! but i'm just sayin....

                  Boeing has a nice Crew Alert system, that would alert them if no input in say 15 minutes (set by customer), and requires an input (Mike key, button push, knob turn) and would increase the alarm frequency as time passes.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I just heard on the news allegedly that this aircraft had one of the older flight recorders that only records the last 30 minutes of the flight; therefore we will likely never know for sure if the pilots were telling the truth if they were arguing or if they fell asleep.

                    Either way the pilots are at fault. However it would have been nice to know what happened to best be able to prevent a recurrence.

                    I am skeptical that pilots were arguing so intensely that they did not notice radio calls or cockpit alarms.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by W7PSK View Post
                      Boeing has a nice Crew Alert system, that would alert them if no input in say 15 minutes (set by customer), and requires an input (Mike key, button push, knob turn) and would increase the alarm frequency as time passes.
                      Hmmmm, is this a jibe at those "cheap airbuses?"

                      just kidding! But it is good to know that Boeing includes "alarm clocks" as standard equipment.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ATFS_Crash View Post
                        I just heard on the news allegedly that this aircraft had one of the older flight recorders that only records the last 30 minutes of the flight; therefore we will likely never know for sure if the pilots were telling the truth if they were arguing or if they fell asleep.

                        Either way the pilots are at fault. However it would have been nice to know what happened to best be able to prevent a recurrence.

                        I am skeptical that pilots were arguing so intensely that they did not notice radio calls or cockpit alarms.

                        imagine?!? they play the tape and all that is heard is snoring!

                        now, correct me if i was misinformed but a 737 pilot for a local charter company here in FL told me that CVR's can be erased by the crew on the ground. is this true?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service


                          so the BBC reported that two fighter jets were put on alert.

                          tell me something, how often to domestic flights have to check in verbally or otherwise? i mean, seriously! where is the level orange/yellow/red/whatever post-9/11 security if we allow a flight to continue to fly after it fails to check in as required???

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
                            CVR's can be erased by the crew on the ground. is this true?
                            Yes.

                            --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                            --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
                              tell me something, how often to domestic flights have to check in verbally or otherwise? i mean, seriously! where is the level orange/yellow/red/whatever post-9/11 security if we allow a flight to continue to fly after it fails to check in as required???
                              I don't know, but the plane was declard NORDO by the ACT about 1 hour and 20 minutes before they re-established radio contac.

                              (NORDO = No RaDiO: that ATC is calling and there is no answer)

                              --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                              --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X