03-10-2012, 05:13 PM
|
#4781
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 449
|
Thank you for explaining Brian, i will have a look at it and start from scratch again.
__________________
|
|
|
|
03-13-2012, 06:45 PM
|
#4783
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: near EHAM/AMS
Posts: 2,979
|
I can tell you that it is not my style to share my agreements or non agreements with rejections on this forum, even not when asked in a pm  Furthermore, that is not the goal of this thread isn't it? So, I will give you my advise on them. First is a tad too high in the frame, and the other photo you have in the db has a rather similar angle ( http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...202607&nseq=17). The others are a tad high in the frame. These three can easily be adjusted.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2012, 06:45 PM
|
#4784
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom.
Posts: 2,477
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmk2112
|
I agree with all 4 rejections that they are too high in the frame. It's not a huge amount but using our lay-over grid which we can use to aid decisions, the window line which I would use as a point of reference to aid centering is above the centre point on my grid.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2012, 07:12 PM
|
#4785
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 179
|
Thanks Pamela and James, appreciate you replying 
Regards
René
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2012, 05:49 AM
|
#4786
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany - near DUS
Posts: 6,316
|
Centre is roughly at the lower belly side in those shots. So I agree with the rejections too.
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2012, 02:03 PM
|
#4787
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Belfast
Posts: 521
|
I had this rejected for subject too far, although it's not something I particularly agree with in this case as it's a good comparison between the 747 and A380. Should it have been uploaded as a ramp shot?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3773261
Dave
__________________
Last edited by Mr Chips; 03-14-2012 at 02:03 PM.
Reason: Forgot to add the rejection link
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2012, 02:36 PM
|
#4788
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom.
Posts: 2,477
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Chips
I had this rejected for subject too far, although it's not something I particularly agree with in this case as it's a good comparison between the 747 and A380. Should it have been uploaded as a ramp shot?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3773261
Dave |
Yep, Ramp shot would do it Dave as neither aircraft takes primary focus. Nice photo though!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2012, 02:55 PM
|
#4789
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Belfast
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by B7772ADL
Yep, Ramp shot would do it Dave as neither aircraft takes primary focus. Nice photo though!
|
Thanks James! I'll get it reuploaded at some point as a ramp shot.
Cheers!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2012, 05:37 PM
|
#4790
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seahawk
Centre is roughly at the lower belly side in those shots. So I agree with the rejections too.
|
Thanks Stefan. Looks like I've got some re-editing to do... Thanks again 
Regards
René
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 07:25 AM
|
#4791
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Anchorage, Alaska/ Fairbanks,Alaska
Posts: 23
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 08:18 AM
|
#4792
|
|
Jetphotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisV
|
At first view, I don't think there is any denying that perspective-wise it does look unlevel. However on closer inspection, the trees looking upright seems to be an indication that the terrain does slope upward, so yeah I do believe you the shot is level.
The highlights are slightly clipped however, so getting the exposure down a bit would certainly improve the image. I'd then reupload with a remark to the screeners.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 12:22 PM
|
#4794
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAAirlines
|
Hi ya
The spot is just infront of the tail. If you "equalise" it helps to show up any dust spots. I've attached an image to show you 
To clean the sensor ranges from using a blower to eclipse and swabs like I do. I'm sure others are better qualified to assist you with this though.
Regards
René
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 12:47 PM
|
#4795
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
tnx rmk2112
Your attached is very useful.
|
|
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 03:48 PM
|
#4796
|
|
Dutch .......
Join Date: May 2003
Location: EHAM/SPL
Posts: 2,497
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAAirlines
tnx rmk2112
Your attached is very useful.
|
And with the healing tool in Photoshop it's very easy to get rid of the spot also.
__________________
“The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”
Erwin
|
|
|
|
|
03-21-2012, 05:35 AM
|
#4797
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
I am really in shocked!!!!!
This photo Is soft????!!!!
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3781860
after more than 12 day on waiting , I was faced with Strict screener. this photo is not soft. What is your idea?
|
|
|
|
|
03-21-2012, 03:35 PM
|
#4798
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 8,301
|
Your image first, and then a copy with four passes of Unsharp Mask set at 50_0.2_0
A noticeable difference.
__________________
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
|
|
|
|
|
03-22-2012, 03:32 AM
|
#4799
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 55
|
Horizon unlevel
Hi, I'm after help on horizon unlevel again. This picture was rejected for unlevel:
I appealed and a head screener was kind enough to leave a comment saying CW rotation was needed. Re-edited with 0.2 degree CW rotation, and it was rejected for the same reason:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3782640
What amount and direction of rotation is needed to fix this? My reference are the vertical lines on the the white & orange structure, picture right.
Thanks,
Edwin.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-22-2012, 05:55 AM
|
#4800
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 8,301
|
@Edwin...
At first glance the red structure appears visually to be leaning to the left to me but....
.....using the screeners horizon check tool it looks damn near perfect to me. The angle of view means you cannot use the runway as a level check. Personally I would have accepted it as did one of the three screeners that saw it.
I'd appeal that one giving the reason as being that the red structure is vertical.
__________________
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 PM.
|
