05-11-2013, 09:36 AM
|
#5621
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 6,644
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdeboer
Yeah, these little compact camera's can have amazing quality.
If you are not sure about the correct info or categories, you can always check the upload guideline, or ask here before uploading. Could save some frustration 
|
Actually, I did, I think this sentence threw me off in my head:
Quote:
1.1.6 Uploading Wing Views
Shots taken airborne need to be 'Inflight' unless an airport is visible in the shot.
|
Obviously this means if you are actually over said airport, not if one is visible in the distance, I just didn't think about that, plus LAX was in the auto-fill from my previous upload.
|
|
|
05-13-2013, 10:57 AM
|
#5622
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 6,644
|
For being a brand new 748i, this window was quite dirty...I cloned a lot of spots and blemishes, but there are still some lines and smudges, does this have a chance?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=4234472
|
|
|
05-14-2013, 02:00 PM
|
#5623
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 32
|
Hi, I was very surprised this one got 3 different rejection reasons..
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4217723
I agree it may be tad over-sharp, but where is it over-exposed? Edge of the wings?
I'm not sure how to rectify the contrast on this one either. Does it need less contrast maybe?
Some advice would be much appreciated. Thanks.
|
|
|
05-14-2013, 02:51 PM
|
#5624
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,062
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aviationhk
Hi, I was very surprised this one got 3 different rejection reasons..
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4217723
I agree it may be tad over-sharp, but where is it over-exposed? Edge of the wings?
I'm not sure how to rectify the contrast on this one either. Does it need less contrast maybe?
Some advice would be much appreciated. Thanks.
|
Hey there,
There's too much contrast in the image. There's quite a bit of pure black and pure white in it.
I do think that if you correct the contrast it will also fix the overexposure.
And since you agree on the oversharp, I wont comment on that.
__________________
Sam Rudge
A 5D3, some Canon lenses, the Sigma L and a flash
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 05:06 AM
|
#5625
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7
|
Hi,
The below image was rejected for horizon unlevel. I have used the horizontal boundary wall (blue coloured) & also, another brownish hedge like structure in the foreground, both of which seem level.
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=4223198
Need some guidance on this image.
Regards,
Pats
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 06:07 AM
|
#5626
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,531
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by patkini
Hi,
The below image was rejected for horizon unlevel. I have used the horizontal boundary wall (blue coloured) & also, another brownish hedge like structure in the foreground, both of which seem level.
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=4223198
Need some guidance on this image.
Regards,
Pats
|
A little CCW rotation is needed.
Regards
Alex
__________________
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 06:53 AM
|
#5627
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This !
A little CCW rotation is needed.
Regards
Alex
|
Sir,
Thanks for your reply. Can you please suggest some object as the reference to ensure I do not overdo the CCW?
Rgds,
Pats
|
|
|
05-16-2013, 10:19 AM
|
#5628
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,531
|
after checking it on PS, you can apply a 0.4 CCW rotation
Regards
Alex
__________________
|
|
|
05-17-2013, 09:03 AM
|
#5629
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7
|
Dear screeners,
I got this reject today for Motive & Horizon. I have two Questions:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4224793
1) Can you please suggest a good reference for this picture? I did not really find one perfect reference in this pic, & hence, tried to ensure that people do not seem to be leaning.
2) As mentioned in the mail, the bad motive rejection is for recognisable faces of people in the bottom left of the picture. Can you suggest ways to improve the picture like say Blurring the faces of people or is tighter cropping the only option?
Awaiting your reply.
Rgds,
Pats
Last edited by patkini; 05-17-2013 at 09:06 AM.
Reason: Spelling mistake
|
|
|
05-17-2013, 10:39 AM
|
#5630
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,531
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by patkini
Dear screeners,
I got this reject today for Motive & Horizon. I have two Questions:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4224793
1) Can you please suggest a good reference for this picture? I did not really find one perfect reference in this pic, & hence, tried to ensure that people do not seem to be leaning.
2) As mentioned in the mail, the bad motive rejection is for recognisable faces of people in the bottom left of the picture. Can you suggest ways to improve the picture like say Blurring the faces of people or is tighter cropping the only option?
Awaiting your reply.
Rgds,
Pats
|
Hi Pats,
What you have to ask yourself is "how aviation related your pic is ?" Okay there's a few waiting seats, gates, a few shops, but not much differences from what you would find in a big shopping center or a train station. For that reason alone, this shot'll never be accepted. Now, no you can't blur faced, when taking your shot you got to be aware of not putting faces in frame to avoid the motive rejection.
- The "City next" publicity on top is also very disturbing for the whole shot.
- Picture is quiet blurry at places.
- And finally about the horizon, it needs a good ccw rotation, but as I've said before this one is for the personal collection and is not suitable for JP.net
Best regards
Alex
__________________
|
|
|
Today, 12:37 PM
|
#5631
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Medemblik, The Netherlands
Posts: 289
|
horizon unlevel
This one was rejected, because the horizon was unlevel. I appealed this one and it was rejected again. Comment: all vertical lines lean to the left
But I don't see it. When I open the photo in PSE and use the Rectangular Marquee Tool, all the vertical lines are exactly vertical. See the yellow sign at the foreground on the leftside or the little white and red pole.
The Photo: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4226893
Your opinion please.
__________________
|
|
|
Today, 01:54 PM
|
#5632
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: near EHAM/AMS
Posts: 2,973
|
The taxiway dose not have that much slope on that spot. The signs and posts next to the taxiway and the pole in the back lean to the left.
Just rotate it 0.9-1 degrees cw and you will see that it look much better.
__________________
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 PM.
|