Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

9/11 conspiracy theory again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by TheKiecker View Post
    "but Iv'e been pulling up the whole time"
    Excellent comment.

    Please see post #7 of this thread.
    Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by 3WE View Post
      Excellent comment.

      Please see post #7 of this thread.
      Again you and your boring "fundamental airmanship" yada-yada.

      --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
      --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
        Again you and your boring "fundamental airmanship" yada-yada.
        Oh, you want to get personal?

        Originally posted by Gabriel
        Manage angle of attack blah blah blah (for a full page no less)
        Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.

        Comment


        • #34
          5th group?

          Early on, there was talk in the news about a 5th possible group who attempted to board a 5th plane but bailed out on the mission. AFAIK, these folks were never caught. What became of this?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by flight191 View Post
            Early on, there was talk in the news about a 5th possible group who attempted to board a 5th plane but bailed out on the mission. AFAIK, these folks were never caught. What became of this?
            Rubbish.

            That grew out a a wikileaks revealed cable sent February 11, 2010, by the US Embassy in Doha to the National Counterterrorism Center in Virginia. It was innaccurate. Mohamed ali Mohamed al-Dahham al-Mansoori was profiled exhaustively and no link could be found connecting him to the 9/11 plot. He and two other potential terrorists (not 9/11 co-conspirators) flew from the US to London on September 10.

            While acknowledging that the men may have had nefarious purposes in the US (“You can never say never.”), the official said that in the follow-up investigation the FBI was unable to locate any nexus between the Qatari men and known al-Qaeda plotters, leaders, or support cells. As part of the PENTTBOM investigation, the subject of the Qatari men was raised in FBI and other US government interviews of detainees at Guantanamo and other sites, including with al-Qaeda mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who organized the 9/11 attacks and was captured in Pakistan in 2003. “Nothing fit. They don’t cross paths with anyone,” the official explained.
            There was the potential 20th hijacker however, Zacarias Moussaoui, who proved clearly that some people can never be taught how to fly.

            Comment


            • #36
              evan has spoken. the gospel is now known. there will be no doubters lest ye be cast down with the sodomites!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by 3WE View Post
                Oh, you want to get personal?

                Originally posted by Gabriel
                Manage angle of attack blah blah blah (for a full thread no less)
                Fixed.

                --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Evan View Post
                  Rubbish.

                  That grew out a a wikileaks revealed cable sent February 11, 2010, by the US Embassy in Doha to the National Counterterrorism Center in Virginia. It was innaccurate. Mohamed ali Mohamed al-Dahham al-Mansoori was profiled exhaustively and no link could be found connecting him to the 9/11 plot. He and two other potential terrorists (not 9/11 co-conspirators) flew from the US to London on September 10.

                  There was the potential 20th hijacker however, Zacarias Moussaoui, who proved clearly that some people can never be taught how to fly.
                  Thank you for the clarification.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    When you mention what would cause a flash when building come down, you have any number of sources. Remember, large quantities of JP went down the shafts causing damage we can only guess about such as the natural gas supply to the facility and most of all in my mind are the thousands of gallons of diesel fuel stored in order to run the emergency generator systems.

                    We even had a massive diesel generator next to my office at a coal fired power generating plant.
                    Live, from a grassy knoll somewhere near you.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by guamainiac View Post
                      When you mention what would cause a flash when building come down, you have any number of sources. Remember, large quantities of JP went down the shafts causing damage we can only guess about such as the natural gas supply to the facility and most of all in my mind are the thousands of gallons of diesel fuel stored in order to run the emergency generator systems.

                      We even had a massive diesel generator next to my office at a coal fired power generating plant.
                      Or the tremendous air pressure of a burning building imploding onto itself.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Evan View Post
                        Or the tremendous air pressure of a burning building imploding onto itself.
                        Basically concur.

                        Super-heated, oxygen-limited gasses get displaced out into some fresher air with higher 02 levels and you get a brief burst of hotter fire...

                        I don't know that, but it seems likely.
                        Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by 3WE View Post
                          Basically concur.

                          Super-heated, oxygen-limited gasses get displaced out into some fresher air with higher 02 levels and you get a brief burst of hotter fire...

                          I don't know that, but it seems likely.
                          +1 (the modern way to say concur)

                          --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                          --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Ag. what the heck I got nothing to loose:

                            Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.


                            Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.


                            Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.


                            I've got all the videos on 911. it's so easy to see. I have sources from the horses mouth that they did it. you can have people read it from their own web-sites and reports, and still they belief it was just an unfortunate attack even if it stated right there in fornt of their eyes. You can take people to the water, but you can't make them drink (or think) outside of the box. sadly. some people don't want to believe, because they cannot or are not ready to face facts.

                            CNN news reports were falsified: in fact you can access clips where a flash goes of before the plane hits, and the next frame the wing of plane still sticks out from another part of the building with no damage inbetween. Modified drones hit the buildings with supportive inner-planted bombs. The news reports were masterful edits. (co-ordinated from building 7, and why it was destroyed to get rid of evidence)

                            Speaking of Building 7, no plane hit, but implodes, for reason now known.

                            The president get the news before it happens. time stamps caught them out. Memorial sites dates are before the event. And as per video, what are they telling the people subliminally? Have you seen the 1960 game that spells out everything and "they" planned to do? Not just the towers! it's also on your $ printed notes. when folded correctly they say how they are going to bring the economy down. After bush Obama vs Osama... too many co-incidences.

                            The buildings implode, falls straight downwards. it was controlled demolition. voice recordings AND OFFICIAL REPORTS confirms building were ordered to be destroyed.
                            (i mean they do not want evidence of the whole event just sitting around.)

                            People inside open building gaps where fuel supposed to have burned everything to a crisp with the explosion.

                            The hole of the pentagon is to small for a 757 plane crash

                            What about all the cameras that just so happened to be nicely placed to record the events. not to mention the increased activity by fbi reported by people before the event.

                            Let's not forget that when the towers went, so did economic and religious freedom. The new world order calls it the "right event" to bring things into motion

                            not to mention how the military failed 4 times to identify the problem. and on and on and on and on. it was actually quite interesting to go into the pictures and documents again.

                            All I can say is masterfully done freemasons/jesuits! You've got the people well disillusioned as planned to this day.

                            Now go ahead... rant, rave, jump, foam, scream... i don't care. it's no longer a theory for me, but fact, and that is what I choose. all have the right to study and come their own conclusion. Just never say you did not know.... they (themselves) told you in so many ways.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Out of curiosity, why Jesuits?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Hi Brian, When does your shift start?

                                --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                                --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X