A search in this forum did not find a thread, so I'll take a chance on starting one. Seattle Times ran this article in today's edition. Got my imagination fired up. http://www.seattletimes.com/business...irline-delays/
They say it is about speeding up departures, but it immediately reminded me of working with Work Visa people from South India. I always had to push them to the instant messaging app because their "English fluency" was not intelligible to anyone not from their region. There wasn't TIME to have them repeat things over and over. Anyway, so English is alleged to be the "global language of air traffic control". To me, that's a joke. Just because someone knows the meaning of a word doesn't mean they can say it comprehensibly. Even the dialects on the British Island are so various, I can't help wondering if there are difficulties. Take in pronunciation differences of natives of every country on the planet, and I just don't see how radio transmission is an ideal way of communicating. So instant messages and email seem a good move.
BUT my mind didn't stop there. These tiny incremental things have the advantage of not asking entrenched minds to adjust too much. But the 20th century would have been much less impressive if every innnovator settled for what the slowest minds could accept. So my thought is that the control tower should HAVE control. As it is, a captain can really go whenever he wants to. Only discipline makes him wait. And if he's too obsessed with falling behind his itinerary like the guy on the Canary Islands, he can just slam into gear and GO! So it is a misnomer to say ATC "controls". It distributes DATA and then relies on its proper use. You want the tower guys to CONTROL, given them a switch that cripples planes till it is safe to roll. Not really expecting such a utopian solution in this messy world, but can't let my mind be constrained by the realm of possibility. Edison wasn't.
They say it is about speeding up departures, but it immediately reminded me of working with Work Visa people from South India. I always had to push them to the instant messaging app because their "English fluency" was not intelligible to anyone not from their region. There wasn't TIME to have them repeat things over and over. Anyway, so English is alleged to be the "global language of air traffic control". To me, that's a joke. Just because someone knows the meaning of a word doesn't mean they can say it comprehensibly. Even the dialects on the British Island are so various, I can't help wondering if there are difficulties. Take in pronunciation differences of natives of every country on the planet, and I just don't see how radio transmission is an ideal way of communicating. So instant messages and email seem a good move.
BUT my mind didn't stop there. These tiny incremental things have the advantage of not asking entrenched minds to adjust too much. But the 20th century would have been much less impressive if every innnovator settled for what the slowest minds could accept. So my thought is that the control tower should HAVE control. As it is, a captain can really go whenever he wants to. Only discipline makes him wait. And if he's too obsessed with falling behind his itinerary like the guy on the Canary Islands, he can just slam into gear and GO! So it is a misnomer to say ATC "controls". It distributes DATA and then relies on its proper use. You want the tower guys to CONTROL, given them a switch that cripples planes till it is safe to roll. Not really expecting such a utopian solution in this messy world, but can't let my mind be constrained by the realm of possibility. Edison wasn't.
Comment