Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by yousaf View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7539[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7540[/ATTACH]


    any particular issues ?

    Tower photo will be without watermark.

    The main problem would be the tower photo here. I'd say almost a motive or composition rejection as the remainder of the photo adds nothing to it. I'd prefer to see a portrait cropped version of just the tower. In addition there seems to be a halo around the tower which could be a result of editing. Also just looking at my laptop there appears to be possible over-use of noise reduction and the left side appears soft and smeared.

    With the lower photo of the aircraft, you need to take another look at the horizon. It's leaning to the right and needs CCW rotation.

    Comment


    • Hi,

      Another shots from me:
      Click image for larger version

Name:	A9C-KB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	615.5 KB
ID:	1015684 Click image for larger version

Name:	JA733J.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	605.0 KB
ID:	1015686 Click image for larger version

Name:	JY-BAA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	673.7 KB
ID:	1015685 Click image for larger version

Name:	G-YMMP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	570.2 KB
ID:	1015687 Click image for larger version

Name:	G-VIIK.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	514.9 KB
ID:	1015688

      Many thanks

      Comment


      • Originally posted by B7772ADL View Post
        The main problem would be the tower photo here. I'd say almost a motive or composition rejection as the remainder of the photo adds nothing to it. I'd prefer to see a portrait cropped version of just the tower. In addition there seems to be a halo around the tower which could be a result of editing. Also just looking at my laptop there appears to be possible over-use of noise reduction and the left side appears soft and smeared.

        With the lower photo of the aircraft, you need to take another look at the horizon. It's leaning to the right and needs CCW rotation.
        Adjusted the horizon more carefully, used the ground ass reference.
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8419-Jetphotos-CCW.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	872.3 KB
ID:	1015689

        Comment


        • hi JP crew! what about these?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-JSF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.26 MB
ID:	1015691
          Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIZI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	1015693
          Click image for larger version

Name:	F-GRGC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1015692

          thanks

          Comment


          • Hi,

            #1, #4 and #5 would be a dark/under & contrast rejection for me as the aircraft itself is too dark. #2 would be borderline for me, #3 looks fine

            Regards,
            Sebastian

            Originally posted by pawelm View Post
            Hi,

            Another shots from me:
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]7543[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]7545[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]7544[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]7546[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]7547[/ATTACH]

            Many thanks

            Comment


            • Originally posted by yousaf View Post
              Adjusted the horizon more carefully, used the ground ass reference.
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]7548[/ATTACH]
              Hi,

              should be acceptable.

              Regards,
              Sebastian

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Mester Aron View Post
                hi JP crew! what about these?

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]7550[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]7552[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]7551[/ATTACH]

                thanks

                Hi,

                #1 and #2 are acceptable, #3 is a bit too dark

                Regards,
                Sebastian

                Comment


                • Hi, all JP crew. My photo was said to be overexposed in the other forum, I pulled back the exposure of them. Are they now okay? Are there any issues that could lead to rejections?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	JP239-2[1400PX].jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1015709
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	JP240-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	787.8 KB
ID:	1015710
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	JP242-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	688.0 KB
ID:	1015711
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	JP243-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	731.6 KB
ID:	1015712
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	JP244-2[1400PX].jpg
Views:	1
Size:	757.4 KB
ID:	1015713

                  Thanks a lot.
                  Newbie to JP, view my photos here:
                  http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=87690

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by austinshih90 View Post
                    Hi, all JP crew. My photo was said to be overexposed in the other forum, I pulled back the exposure of them. Are they now okay? Are there any issues that could lead to rejections?

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7576[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7577[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7578[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7579[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]7580[/ATTACH]

                    Thanks a lot.
                    Still a bit bright, but should be easy to fix.

                    Comment


                    • Hello
                      This photo is ok ?

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4161 3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.26 MB
ID:	1015723
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by uveges13 View Post
                        Hello
                        This photo is ok ?

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]7592[/ATTACH]
                        Don't see any major issues.

                        Comment


                        • Hi there,
                          Would it be possible to have some advice on the attached photo please.
                          Many thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	ET-ATQ_20160823_LHR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	708.8 KB
ID:	1015725

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bobh View Post
                            Hi there,
                            Would it be possible to have some advice on the attached photo please.
                            Many thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]7594[/ATTACH]
                            Should be fine, don't see any major issues.

                            Comment


                            • Thank you for the quick reply. I'll pop it into the queue

                              Comment


                              • is that one ok for JP ?

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	891.7 KB
ID:	1015731

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X