If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Airbus cancels its contract with Japan's Skymark Airlines for the purchase of six A380 aircraft.
Hmmmmmm... there was always that nagging doubt in the back of my head that the Skymark deal wouldn't work. Salespeople in Toulouse probably thought that if Skymark gets A380s they would penetrate the Japanese market and JAL and ANA would order them too.
That being said, who would be interested in picking up the ex-Skymark planes as well as production slots?
Hmmmmmm... there was always that nagging doubt in the back of my head that the Skymark deal wouldn't work. Salespeople in Toulouse probably thought that if Skymark gets A380s they would penetrate the Japanese market and JAL and ANA would order them too.
That being said, who would be interested in picking up the ex-Skymark planes as well as production slots?
Hum. That's a good question, especially for somebody with my avatar. I can add one arguable detail to this thread, which I could correct within two seconds, but, I am not a wikipedia fan since they voted against me being one of their administrators.... ....
So, Peter. Please correct it in wiki, and you can insert the BBC link (British Broadcasting Corporation, est. 1922).
Since I know my HomeAirport (more than 30 years), I am a Boeing Fan, so we should ask another airline.
AF (Air France), QF (Qantas), BA (British Airways), ...?
Last edited by LH-B744; 2014-07-30, 04:36.
Reason: Let me try to follow Peters hint, less abbreviations...
The German long haul is alive, 65 years and still kicking.
The Gold Member in the 747 club, 50 years since the first LH 747.
And constantly advanced, 744 and 748 /w upper and lower EICAS.
This is Lohausen International airport speaking, echo delta delta lima.
Salespeople in Toulouse probably thought that if Skymark gets A380s they would penetrate the Japanese market and JAL and ANA would order them too.
^This. I thought from day-1 that the only reason Airbus entertained a risky order like this, was thinking that it might encourage JL/NH into ordering as well.
I'm thinking that they (along with CX) have long been doing a happy-dance that they decided to sit out the A380, at least for now.
AF (Air France), QF (Qantas), BA (British Airways), ...?
The way I see it, all of the above have enough A380s already. There are only so many routes out of Paris or London that you can fill an A380 on. As for Qantas, since they went into bed with Emirates, I think the writing has been on the wall for their westbound long-haul operation. They will get rid of their A380s (and 747s) at the first opportunity.
So far, the following clients have ordered the A380, with RR Trenth 900s, and have outstanding deliveries;
Virgin Atlantic - which ordered 6, and have yet to take delivery of any of their aircraft.
Singapore Airlines - which has ordered 24, with 1 option, and has taken delivery of 19 - thus if all options taken up would allow them to take 6 more aircraft.
British Airways - which has ordered 12 with 7 options - of which only 6 have been delivered.
Apart from those;
If TG, LH, CZ, OZ, LH or any less likely - MH or QF (both in dire straits financially, with QF deferring their deliveries), chose to do so, they could acquire the aircraft likely at a discount from EADS and still keep the same engine type.
Apart from that - 10 aircraft are currently listed as 'unidentified customers' with another 20 ordered under "Amadeo" (which will begin taking deliveries in 2016) - which have yet to identify an engine option for the type.
In short - the aircraft might not sit long with EADS, but their lenght of stay will likely depend on discounting them, or shifting production to account for them in the run - to other clients - of which, there are options above.
A Nipponese speaker will have to verify the translation, however as was quoted publically here;
Nishikubo also expressed some reservations about the A330 fleet plan, stating that while the airline had funding in place for the first two aircraft, the third and subsequent deliveries could be impacted by the performance of Skymark's domestic operation as well as the success of its initial international service.
Nishikubo currently holds a 30% stake in the carrier, the largest at the company. If the situation is that fragile, then perhaps EADS was wise in not wishing to extend upon said fragility.
I wish the airline the best of luck, and truly wish for their success - however, their recent shift from LCC to Premium carrier is one that is both risky and perhaps emblematic of a carrier still hoping to find its footing. Admirable, yes - but also risky. They are coming under increasing pressure on the lower end of the cost spectrum from the growing market share of many new Japanese LCC (Air Asia and Jet Star - among two of whom have established long-haul carriers that one can connect easily onto).
I can see where EADS would be cautious here. Let's see how this change in business plan pans out, prior to financing a batch of new aircraft.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment