07-18-2012, 08:50 AM
|
#81
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EDQG
Posts: 73
|
Well done screeners, well done! Queue down to almost 7000.
But I am sorry to tell you that I've started uploading again so I hope the queue didnīt rise too fast
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 10:38 PM
|
#82
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin Ireland
Posts: 464
|
|
|
|
07-19-2012, 03:55 AM
|
#83
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 8,300
|
On a training course but........
http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgPePk3kGZk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
.....and the next Popham is just 9 days away. ....and rumours that super moderator status gives me certain queue manipulation rights are entirely false. Trust me, I'm a paramedic !!
__________________
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Last edited by brianw999; 07-19-2012 at 04:05 AM.
|
|
|
07-19-2012, 02:27 PM
|
#84
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 243
|
The queue has been steady at around 7000 for several days now .. excellent guys! thanks!
__________________
|
|
|
07-19-2012, 03:59 PM
|
#85
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberto U.
The queue has been steady at around 7000 for several days now .. excellent guys! thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
07-20-2012, 10:17 PM
|
#86
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Gouda, Netherlands
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianw999
|
Still too bad you were not there when I was at Popham in May of this year.
__________________
|
|
|
07-21-2012, 02:00 PM
|
#87
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 100
|
Thank you screeners!!! From 7,500 in the queue to processed in just over 4 days - that is dedication from all of you!!!!
__________________
|
|
|
07-21-2012, 03:59 PM
|
#88
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 408
|
Foreword: I am not complaining...I'm simply commenting on the topic.
Dropping the queue is always a good thing, but it floods the DB to the point where # of views per shot are horrible! I've had 13 shots accepted over the last 14 days, but total "yesterday views" for all of my shots are well below 1,000 every day.
I know views aren't everything but I put a good deal of work into post-processing to bring out the best quality possible and I like for others to see that.
|
|
|
07-22-2012, 11:55 AM
|
#89
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdgrubb
Foreword: I am not complaining...I'm simply commenting on the topic.
Dropping the queue is always a good thing, but it floods the DB to the point where # of views per shot are horrible! I've had 13 shots accepted over the last 14 days, but total "yesterday views" for all of my shots are well below 1,000 every day.
I know views aren't everything but I put a good deal of work into post-processing to bring out the best quality possible and I like for others to see that.
|
Hans,
I definitely agree with you on the issue as above.
And one more thing.
I think that when there is a quick screening, there are many more rejections.
Actually I do not think, I'm sure. The statistics are not misleading!
Note that three files attached:
The accepted ratio percentage is down recently.
It is no coincidence in my opinion.
I just wanted to remind, before somebody writes another answer, against me, that I wrote here many times that does not always have to hurry with the screening...
Best regards,
Erez.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2012, 02:55 PM
|
#90
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,975
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdgrubb
Foreword: I am not complaining...I'm simply commenting on the topic.
Dropping the queue is always a good thing, but it floods the DB to the point where # of views per shot are horrible! I've had 13 shots accepted over the last 14 days, but total "yesterday views" for all of my shots are well below 1,000 every day.
I know views aren't everything but I put a good deal of work into post-processing to bring out the best quality possible and I like for others to see that.
|
Theres not much we can do about that. It's impossible to keep everyone on the site happy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErezS
The accepted ratio percentage is down recently.
It is no coincidence in my opinion.
|
It's not a coincidence, no. Unfortunately whenever the queue is reduced to what it is today, we get an influx of crap photos. We don't suddenly change the way we screen just because the queue is low.
Sam
|
|
|
07-22-2012, 03:50 PM
|
#91
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RingwaySam
Theres not much we can do about that. It's impossible to keep everyone on the site happy.
|
I know that by reading through the forum 
I'm happy here-just giving my 2 cents on the topic
|
|
|
07-22-2012, 09:09 PM
|
#92
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by B7772ADL
We've had a great effort today from the screening team to get through some of the backlog and I'd also like to welcome our newest member of the screening team, Dave Henderson, who has joined us this weekend. Dave has been a long standing contributer to the site with some excellent quality photos. So please no moaning anyone about us not taking on new screeners! 
|
Ah. I was wondering who the mysterious "DH" was who left me a compliment on a recently accepted 727 shot.
Much appreciated. And kudos to all on another epic queue-reducing job.
|
|
|
07-22-2012, 11:51 PM
|
#93
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RingwaySam
Theres not much we can do about that. It's impossible to keep everyone on the site happy.
It's not a coincidence, no. Unfortunately whenever the queue is reduced to what it is today, we get an influx of crap photos. We don't suddenly change the way we screen just because the queue is low.
Sam
|
Well, I am one of tha happy ones right now. Once again, thanks for the hard work guys, I NEVER expected to see the queue at under 6000. Simply outstanding. I'm just being curious here but ... how did you manage to reduce the queue that much?
About the influx of crap pictures, weren't they uploaded anyway, the difference being it took longer for them to be screened?
again, thanks!
rgds
__________________
|
|
|
07-23-2012, 12:08 AM
|
#94
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 8,300
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberto U.
.....About the influx of crap pictures, weren't they uploaded anyway, the difference being it took longer for them to be screened?
again, thanks!
rgds
|
Actually......you are probably very correct. We just didn't notice them in amongst the better stuff.
It is true to say though that there are a few......shall we say......lower grade photogs....who won't upload if they have to wait a couple of weeks but will upload if it only takes a few days.
__________________
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
|
|
|
07-23-2012, 04:42 AM
|
#95
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany - near DUS
Posts: 6,316
|
And generally there are less obvious faults, if the waiting time is longer. All in all I would say I had at least triple the Scan / Cmos rejection this weekend compared to when the queue was at 15.000.
|
|
|
07-23-2012, 05:25 PM
|
#96
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich Kloten - LSZH
Posts: 11,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErezS
Hans,
I definitely agree with you on the issue as above.
And one more thing.
I think that when there is a quick screening, there are many more rejections.
Actually I do not think, I'm sure. The statistics are not misleading!
Note that three files attached:
The accepted ratio percentage is down recently.
It is no coincidence in my opinion.
I just wanted to remind, before somebody writes another answer, against me, that I wrote here many times that does not always have to hurry with the screening...
Best regards,
Erez.
|
These 3 graphs are misleading. July acc. rate is currently at around 65.6%, june was at 67,1%, 2012 total is around 66.1%. So, hardly a significant change.
|
|
|
07-24-2012, 10:30 PM
|
#97
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Belfast
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smartguy24
Ah. I was wondering who the mysterious "DH" was who left me a compliment on a recently accepted 727 shot.
Much appreciated. And kudos to all on another epic queue-reducing job.
|
No worries Andrew, I'm the secret mysterious screener  I do enjoy leaving comments from time to time on both images I like and images I happen to reject.
Regards,
Dave
__________________
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06 PM.
|