Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

[Brenden S]

For a start your not supposed to put photos that are in the que into this thread.
The 787 is grainy/noise so is the 738. The Airbus looks ok.

[daytonabch04]

Thanks!

-Dustin

Originally Posted by Alex - Spot-This !

Dustin,

Stearman shot looks great ! 2nd one would get rejected for obstruction. 3rd one looks ok to me.

Regards
Alex

[pvupilot]

Besides size, does this photo have anything that would hold it back?

[Fredda9000]

Anything to say about the crop and light on this one?

[pdeboer]

Originally Posted by Fredda9000

Anything to say about the crop and light on this one?

The a/c is too low in the frame and has a tad too much dead space on the left. Furthermore it think it is rather dark, and the front end is soft.

[pdeboer]

Originally Posted by pvupilot

Besides size, does this photo have anything that would hold it back?

I am afraid it is backlit and unleveled

[jeremydando]

Hello Screeners;

Wondering if this would work for the database. A black and white conversion of the retro livery Air Canada.



Thanks in advance.

[LX-A343]

B/W conversions is only allowed for vintage aircraft. Apart from that, the photo lacks contrast.

[jeremydando]

Originally Posted by LX-A343

B/W conversions is only allowed for vintage aircraft. Apart from that, the photo lacks contrast.

Ok, thanks.

[Brenden S]

The nose is also blurry

[aviationhk]

Hello,

I'd appreciate some input on this photograph. This is my second edit of this plane. Previously the first edit was rejected for being oversharpened, noisy & of the wrong genre. I hope it's appropriately sharpened & not too noisy now.

For the genre, which would the screeners deem correct for a 737 military transport aircraft?

Thanks.

[brianw999]

Originally Posted by aviationhk

Hello,

I'd appreciate some input on this photograph. This is my second edit of this plane. Previously the first edit was rejected for being oversharpened, noisy & of the wrong genre. I hope it's appropriately sharpened & not too noisy now.

For the genre, which would the screeners deem correct for a 737 military transport aircraft?

Thanks.

Given that it is a military aircraft ...... The genre is Military !

[aviationhk]

Unless I'm mistaken I did select Military for genre but it still got a bad genre selection on the first attempt.

Anyway I am more concerned that the image now looks too soft. Do you think it needs more sharpening?

Thanks.

[yash777]

Hi guys,

I am trying to upload this photo from the Chicago Air and Water Show but I am not quite sure what and how to put the 'other location'. Can someonene help please?

Thanks
Yash

[Siegi N.]

Hello,
This photo is ok?

The aircraft is center in the fram?

Regards,
Siegi.

[brianw999]

Originally Posted by Siegi N.

Hello,
This photo is ok?
Attachment 5097
The aircraft is center in the fram?

Regards,
Siegi.

Looks OK to me.

[brianw999]

Originally Posted by yash777

Hi guys,

I am trying to upload this photo from the Chicago Air and Water Show but I am not quite sure what and how to put the 'other location'. Can someonene help please?

Thanks
Yash

Go to the "other location" link on the upload page and type " Chicago Air and Water Show - ( where it was located ) . Don't type "other location", that will autofill.

[brianw999]

Originally Posted by aviationhk

Unless I'm mistaken I did select Military for genre but it still got a bad genre selection on the first attempt.

Anyway I am more concerned that the image now looks too soft. Do you think it needs more sharpening?

Thanks.

Difficult to tell as I'm looking at it on an iPad. It does look a touch soft and possibly het hazed on the front end.

[MarkLawrence]

Long time since I tried a night shot - does it work?

[Brenden S]

Nice night shot, however the nose is a little blurry. Try select sharpening the large image first and then crop and resize and see how it turns out as you may be able to rescue it. Nice lighting etc too.