07-25-2012, 10:50 AM
|
#9641
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: La Jolla - KSAN
Posts: 219
|
Hi, was wondering if this could pass as a spotting location one? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
07-25-2012, 04:59 PM
|
#9642
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Belfast
Posts: 533
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
Hi, was wondering if this could pass as a spotting location one? Thanks.
|
Kevin, I'd have to say no, as the main focus of a spotting lcoation upload should be the location itself, in your image the people are out of focus and it doesn't show much regarding the location itself.
I would imagine the only way to get a spotting location image here is to stand well back and photograph the people and the general platform area, with an aircraft in the sky in the background.
Dave
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2012, 01:10 AM
|
#9643
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: La Jolla - KSAN
Posts: 219
|
Aah okay! Glad I brought this up here haha Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2012, 01:49 AM
|
#9644
|
|
High Sierra Spotter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 694
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2012, 03:26 AM
|
#9645
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,170
|
Ryan, Sharp is fine. Horizon, without looking in ps with the grid I would have a guess that it needs .25 ccw rotation. Look at the edge of the hangar and the light pole with the grid in ps.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2012, 04:06 AM
|
#9646
|
|
High Sierra Spotter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenden S
Ryan, Sharp is fine. Horizon, without looking in ps with the grid I would have a guess that it needs .25 ccw rotation. Look at the edge of the hangar and the light pole with the grid in ps.
|
I was thinking the same thing but I think it is due to some distortion from the the lens (18-55mm), I will give it another go though and see how some ccw does. Thanks Brenden!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2012, 10:25 AM
|
#9647
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 46
|
Is the crop ok in the first photo? Anything else to improve?
My guess for the photo from behind is that it won't make the db untill hell freezes over or is there any way to improve that one too?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2012, 02:31 AM
|
#9648
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,170
|
Both Air China A330's are fine, and there are many photos in the database like that.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2012, 06:11 AM
|
#9649
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenden S
Both Air China A330's are fine, and there are many photos in the database like that.
|
Ok, thanks. I thought the second on had to much heat haze for the db.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2012, 05:19 PM
|
#9650
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 231
|
I did some re-editing on some of my shots and would like some input, especially in terms of appropriate crops, sharpness, and noise.
Thanks!
Jerry
__________________
Remember on your hardest days, that the airplanes always take off against the wind... afterwards, the skies are all yours.
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2012, 05:54 PM
|
#9651
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: near EHAM/AMS
Posts: 3,021
|
Jerry, I am afraid they are all more or less blurry.
cheers, Pamela
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2012, 06:33 PM
|
#9652
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdeboer
Jerry, I am afraid they are all more or less blurry.
cheers, Pamela
|
Blurry?!?! Are you sure? Even the 2nd one?
__________________
Remember on your hardest days, that the airplanes always take off against the wind... afterwards, the skies are all yours.
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2012, 08:24 PM
|
#9653
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: near EHAM/AMS
Posts: 3,021
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coke
Blurry?!?! Are you sure? Even the 2nd one?
|
Very sure, even the second one.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-30-2012, 06:45 PM
|
#9655
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: near EHAM/AMS
Posts: 3,021
|
It is soft and lacks contrast. I see it is also saved at a low quality, that increases the soft feel it has. Improvements are easily made: improve contrast, give it some sharpening and save at a higher quality. For all these items there are (older) threads on this forum that you can use for more info. Success!
cheers, Pamela
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 11:16 PM
|
#9656
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20
|
Can I get a feedback for the attached pictures? thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2012, 08:58 AM
|
#9657
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,566
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nozilla
Can I get a feedback for the attached pictures? thanks in advance.
|
Hi,
I would just put a little 0.3 CCW and add some sharpening on the 1st one. The other 2 look really nice
Best regards
Alex
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-03-2012, 12:26 AM
|
#9659
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20
|
Can I have your advice for the attached picture?
|
|
|
|
|
08-03-2012, 06:04 AM
|
#9660
|
|
Guest
|
[quote=RCoulter;599311]How is the leveling on this one? I had to battle distortion again so I have a feeling it may need some rotation...
0.23 CW doesn't make big difference (in my opinion - rookie's opinion)
Ooops! Limited to CREW reply ONLY
Moderator - can you remove my post, please (rookie's mistake)
Last edited by youngfish; 08-03-2012 at 06:21 AM.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 AM.
|
