Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you! - Page 252 - JetPhotos.Net Forums

Felipe Garcia · 07-17-2012, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErezS

and now another rejection:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906394
I'm not see too much noise or grain.
Where do you see it?
I am photographing with a Canon 450D camera and with 70-200L lens and usually I haven't such problem.
Is it so bad?

Best regards,
Erez

I see quite a bit of it. It looks like you may have cropped an area that was smaller than the final size (eg it was 1100px wide and you forced it to be 1200px wide), sorry, I can't find the right word in English for that; or, you created a crop that was nearly 1:1, which will cause a lot more defects (like noise, heat distortion, etc) to show.

Obviously I'm not a screener, but that is my opinion. I took your image and applied to 100% passes of Dfine 2.0 (noise reduction) and it improved, but you do get a significant decrease in details.

07-17-2012, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErezS

Hi,
Is it too much or too little ?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906103
In my opinion it's good contrast.
So, what do you say about it ?

another rejection:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906394
I'm not see too much noise or grain.
Where do you see it?
I am photographing with a Canon 450D camera and with 70-200L lens and usually I haven't such problem.
Is it so bad?

Best regards,
Erez

-

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felipe Garcia

I see quite a bit of it. It looks like you may have cropped an area that was smaller than the final size (eg it was 1100px wide and you forced it to be 1200px wide), sorry, I can't find the right word in English for that; or, you created a crop that was nearly 1:1, which will cause a lot more defects (like noise, heat distortion, etc) to show.

Obviously I'm not a screener, but that is my opinion. I took your image and applied to 100% passes of Dfine 2.0 (noise reduction) and it improved, but you do get a significant decrease in details.

Felipe,
Thank you, but I waiting to answers on two issues from the screening crew members, please.
Thanks in advance.
Erez.

Simpleboy · 07-17-2012, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErezS

Hi,
Is it too much or too little ?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906103
In my opinion it's good contrast.
So, what do you say about it ?

and now another rejection:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906394
I'm not see too much noise or grain.
Where do you see it?
I am photographing with a Canon 450D camera and with 70-200L lens and usually I haven't such problem.
Is it so bad?

Best regards,
Erez

First one, as indicated to you by the screener requires some more dark dones. Not a huge amount, and would probably be best done with the curves than the contrast tool. This should be an easy fix.

The second one not only has noise, but looks like it was originally blurry, and sharpened to within an inch of its life. This has brought out the noise, but has also resulted in a poor quality image. This unfortunately is one for the personal collection.

07-17-2012, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simpleboy

First one, as indicated to you by the screener requires some more dark dones. Not a huge amount, and would probably be best done with the curves than the contrast tool. This should be an easy fix.

The second one not only has noise, but looks like it was originally blurry, and sharpened to within an inch of its life. This has brought out the noise, but has also resulted in a poor quality image. This unfortunately is one for the personal collection.

Thanks,
Is it better now ?

Simpleboy · 07-17-2012, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErezS

Thanks,
Is it better now ?

Much.

07-17-2012, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simpleboy

Much.

Thank you very much.

brianw999 · 07-17-2012, 08:44 PM

Ignore my deletion ^^^

Big cockup !!!
Wrong forum,
Wrong website,
Right bottle of wine !!!!

Kevin · 07-18-2012, 03:04 AM

Hello! I have two recent rejections for undersharpened. To me I think they are both pretty sharp. I don't really know if I want to have white edges around the letters on the plane because in real life they do not

...I think sharp is sharp...oversharpened a little is just...oversharpened. What's your opinion of these? Thanks!

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906809

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906810

Michael Wolf · 07-18-2012, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin

Hello! I have two recent rejections for undersharpened. To me I think they are both pretty sharp. I don't really know if I want to have white edges around the letters on the plane because in real life they do not

...I think sharp is sharp...oversharpened a little is just...oversharpened. What's your opinion of these? Thanks!

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906809

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906810

Both are indeed soft, they need a little more detail.

brianw999 · 07-19-2012, 08:33 PM

I refuse to bite !!

?....

.....ish !

That should REALLY confuse everyone else !

Edwin · 07-21-2012, 02:52 AM

Hi there,

I understand if an image is soft it can normally be saved with better editing; but if it's blurry it should go directly into the waste bin.

This was rejected for blurry:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3906962

I kind of like the colors and would really like to give it another go. So my question is: is the whole thing blurry or just a part of it?

Thanks,
Edwin.

CO777/200 · 07-21-2012, 11:50 AM

Hi, got another two rejections which I don't rally understand.

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3911938

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3911944

both for 'Over Processed / Bad post processing'

I do always the same editing process on my pictures and don't know whats wrong here. Any help?

MarkLawrence · 07-21-2012, 12:26 PM

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3913204

When I uploaded this, I noted on the upload form that I had been unable to find the C/N for this anywhere - I had searched the census, military information websites, google searched for this and asked that if it was rejected, could the screener note where I could get the info - it was just rejected with no information - so - I am asking if anyone else can tell me where they can find the information on this. Thanks

rmk2112 · 07-21-2012, 08:46 PM

Hi ya,
Had this rejected for
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
Is it worth appealing?

Regards
René

KampfHase · 07-21-2012, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rmk2112

Hi ya,
Had this rejected for
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
Is it worth appealing?

Regards
René

Some sceener once told me to center the windows, not the middle of the fuselage.

Mr Chips · 07-21-2012, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rmk2112

Hi ya,
Had this rejected for
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
Is it worth appealing?

Regards
René

If the image was only rejected for composition, then I would appeal it as it's close to being spot on. The image you included in you post does seem to have a bit of compression in it though, I'm not sure whether it's in the image you uploaded or not, so beware.

Mr Chips · 07-21-2012, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KampfHase

Some sceener once told me to center the windows, not the middle of the fuselage.

As a very general rule, yes that's right, although personally, when aircraft are on the ground, centre point through the windows is close to perfect, and for aircraft in the air, the centre point just below the windows is perfect.

Mr Chips · 07-21-2012, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkLawrence

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3913204

When I uploaded this, I noted on the upload form that I had been unable to find the C/N for this anywhere - I had searched the census, military information websites, google searched for this and asked that if it was rejected, could the screener note where I could get the info - it was just rejected with no information - so - I am asking if anyone else can tell me where they can find the information on this. Thanks

I can't help you with the registration or CN, however I think when uploading and you don't know what the cn is, just leave the CN blank, as opposed to typing 'UNKNOWN'. Perhaps another screener has more info on this?

rmk2112 · 07-21-2012, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Chips

If the image was only rejected for composition, then I would appeal it as it's close to being spot on. The image you included in you post does seem to have a bit of compression in it though, I'm not sure whether it's in the image you uploaded or not, so beware.

Thanks Dave, appeal it is then

The compression is because i used MS Paint to draw the lines... I hope
Thanks to Oliver too
Regards
René

Mr Chips · 07-21-2012, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CO777/200

Hi, got another two rejections which I don't rally understand.

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3911938

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3911944

both for 'Over Processed / Bad post processing'

I do always the same editing process on my pictures and don't know whats wrong here. Any help?

Julian, there is a slightly dark hal oaround the BA A321 as can be seen in the equalised version of your image:

http://www.jetphotos.net/members/pro...8798.jpg?14956

As for the SAS MD-80, the edge of the hanger seems to have odd white rectangles sticking out from it, which may or may not have occured during the post processing however the main thing here is the dust spot beside the control tower.

http://www.jetphotos.net/members/pro...8798.jpg?73522