06-25-2012, 07:07 AM
|
#4941
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 8,296
|
^^^
Agree with Gerardo, I'd appeal that. Comment to appeal screener that you don't see any any excessive signs of oversharpening and ask for another look please.
__________________
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
|
|
|
|
06-25-2012, 09:24 AM
|
#4942
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 7,194
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo-G
|
Sorry George, I think this shot can be greatly improved. Jagged edges are evident on most of the tail fin and logos, plus the flap canoes and engines.
A simple rework of the original with some selective sharpening will bring it up to standard.
|
|
|
|
|
06-26-2012, 06:28 AM
|
#4943
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ
Sorry George, I think this shot can be greatly improved. Jagged edges are evident on most of the tail fin and logos, plus the flap canoes and engines.
A simple rework of the original with some selective sharpening will bring it up to standard.
|
No need to apologise, sometimes it takes a keen eye to spot something.
Thanks for pointing the spots out.
|
|
|
|
|
06-26-2012, 06:53 PM
|
#4944
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 8,296
|
Oh shit....
(Note to self. NEVER answer this kind of question when using an iPad) !!!!!
__________________
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2012, 02:37 PM
|
#4945
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 320
|
Size Ratio
I have my other ones that were in the queue that were rejected. I had one question, I have Adobe Photoshop Elements 10 and I was wondering if there was another easy way to add the right size for the photo. I had two that were rejected for size ratio.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3873537
I recieved a rejection e-mail with a suggestion for sizes 1200x910 & 1200x790. Is there a way to resize it without screwing up the picture? (compressing or stretching) I played with the size and unchecked Constrain Proportions to get the size right. I just did not want to mess with the picture too much to make it look bad during the upload. The 1200x790 seems fine for the picture when I did the reupload.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3890511
If it is because of the cropping, it's just that I wanted to not cut out part of the car since it was in the shot. If it is the cropping I can cut it a little bit on the left side near the nose.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2012, 07:50 PM
|
#4946
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CcrlR
I have my other ones that were in the queue that were rejected. I had one question, I have Adobe Photoshop Elements 10 and I was wondering if there was another easy way to add the right size for the photo. I had two that were rejected for size ratio.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3873537
I recieved a rejection e-mail with a suggestion for sizes 1200x910 & 1200x790. Is there a way to resize it without screwing up the picture? (compressing or stretching) I played with the size and unchecked Constrain Proportions to get the size right. I just did not want to mess with the picture too much to make it look bad during the upload. The 1200x790 seems fine for the picture when I did the reupload.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3890511
If it is because of the cropping, it's just that I wanted to not cut out part of the car since it was in the shot. If it is the cropping I can cut it a little bit on the left side near the nose. |
Yes it is because of the way you are cropping. You should be using a crop ratio of 3:2 or 4:3. You may also have an option to crop using specific pixel dimensions as well.
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012, 10:07 AM
|
#4947
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 8,296
|
1200x910 and 1200x790 are incorrect sizes and are outside of our limits. I'm not sure where those sizes came from !
The correct size range for 1200 pixel images is 1200x800 (3:2) and 1200x900 (4:3)
Basically it means that you can upload any 1200 pixel long edge image with the short edge measuring anywhere between 800 and 900 pixels, not less and not more.
To make sure that I don't go out of limits I set my crop size in Photoshop by entering the width and height in the dimensions fields at the top of the window when the crop tool is selected. This will ensure that your crop size and ratio will remain set within limits. You should be able to do this in Elements.
Ps...... some people wonder why their image is around 19 or so pixels higher once uploaded. This is because the copyright bar is added after upload and therefore increases the overall height. You do not need to take any action on this as we accept this increase as an automatic function. This increase in size is taken into account automatically and will not lead to size rejections.
__________________
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Last edited by brianw999; 06-28-2012 at 10:13 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012, 04:35 PM
|
#4948
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 179
|
Hi ya,
Had recently rejected for obscured/foreground clutter, I assume you are referring to the steps. Do you think it would it be better to upload as a "ramp" shot or try should I try my luck sending to www.airstairs.net... 
Thanks as always
Regards
René
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2012, 06:44 PM
|
#4949
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 46
|
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3875772
Got this one rejected for unlevel today. As far as I can see the atc tower is standing straight up, or am I wrong as usual?
Appeald it this morning and it got rejected once again, can someone show me how it's unlevel?
__________________
Last edited by Fredda9000; 06-30-2012 at 06:44 AM.
Reason: Added appeal text.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2012, 01:38 PM
|
#4950
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 55
|
Hi, I'm after some help regarding this rejection:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3876952
It was rejected for Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue). May I know if it's over saturated or had some bad color cast?
Thanks!
Edwin.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2012, 06:47 PM
|
#4951
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredda9000
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3875772
Got this one rejected for unlevel today. As far as I can see the atc tower is standing straight up, or am I wrong as usual?
Appeald it this morning and it got rejected once again, can someone show me how it's unlevel?
|
To me, it looks like it leans to the left. CW rotation would do the trick
Last edited by hdgrubb; 11-24-2012 at 01:29 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2012, 10:02 PM
|
#4952
|
|
Jetphotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edwin
|
I think Bad Color is referring to the yellow/green color cast on the fuselage.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2012, 10:12 PM
|
#4954
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 179
|
Hi ya,
I appealed this rejection for obscured/foreground clutter, asking if "ramp shot" would work and was told "no". I still don't see why it should be rejected as the steps against the door, not just randomly positioned, and I see plenty of other shots with airstairs in the database... 
Regards
René
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2012, 10:14 PM
|
#4955
|
|
Jetphotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CO777/200
|
The plane is sitting too low in the frame. There is more space above the fuselage than below it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2012, 10:58 PM
|
#4956
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EDQG
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by magic48
The plane is sitting too low in the frame. There is more space above the fuselage than below it.
|
Thanks for the quick reply Gianluca. I've noticed that its not 100 percent in frame. But are the screeners so accurate on this issue. If yes you have to delete a lot of pictures in the database.
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2012, 12:32 AM
|
#4957
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 25
|
Hi all,
I have a question about this rejection: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3876504
I have entered this picture as civilian and a small prop but was rejected for categories wrong or missing. What am I missing here?
TIA
Michel
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2012, 02:21 AM
|
#4958
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michel
|
I don't think the screeners consider it a small prop 
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2012, 02:58 PM
|
#4960
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3879367
Hi,
in Iran most aircraft is without any paint . it is white and light is Reflected from body .
in this photo i cant understand overexposed .
what is your idea about this reject?
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 PM.
|
