10-29-2009, 05:10 AM
|
#2481
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YMML
Posts: 204
|
Hi everyone,
I had this one rejected as of being oversharpen. Can someone please tell me where are the jaggies? Which part of the airplane?
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2731629
Thanks,
Mehdi.
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-30-2009, 04:29 AM
|
#2482
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: at the airport
Posts: 304
|
I need some help...
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2726874
After a rejection (and appeal rejection) all I got was "UNDER-sharpened and OVER-processed." and "It appears painted." ??? Is there any editing trick to make this photo look more "realistic"? What does it need? Contrast? More/less sharpening? It is a real photo by the way. 
Thanks in advance.
__________________
Will C.
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2009, 11:24 AM
|
#2483
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 149
|
Gandalf,
Compression is when then image has taken on a slightly distorted look clearly visible around the titling and other areas of high contrast. To avoid this issue highest quality settings in camera and save as highest quality in photoshop. Also have you canhged any settings recently as you say JPEG compression has only started to happen recently.
mnazarinia,
I think the cheatlines and titling is slightly oversharpened. Nice photo by the way it will need a complete re-edit.
Will_Power,
The wing is soft so I would advise selective sharpening onto the wing only. The ground below looks plasticy and smudgy almost as if you used a large amount of noise reduction.
Hope that helps.
Ryan
__________________
LETS FLY RYANAIR
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2009, 07:10 PM
|
#2484
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 34
|
Hello everyone !
I just had this one rejected.
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2733888
I would please require some few advice.
- I don't really see what is blurry in the picture ; and if ever, I think it is still largely within acceptable range.
- I contest the overexposed ; if you look at the histogramm, no parts are overexposed and not even close to the "burnt" limit.
Shall I appeal ? Thank you very much for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 08:10 PM
|
#2486
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 3,647
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopGun37
Hello everyone !
I just had this one rejected.
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2733888
I would please require some few advice.
- I don't really see what is blurry in the picture ; and if ever, I think it is still largely within acceptable range.
- I contest the overexposed ; if you look at the histogramm, no parts are overexposed and not even close to the "burnt" limit.
Shall I appeal ? Thank you very much for your help. |
Not overexposed...if anything, slightly underexposed according to the histogram !
But blurry ?.....Yes, I'm afraid it is. You seem to have tried to sharpen it but it's still difficult to focus on. The giveaway is the registration and the Air France titles which are losing edge definition, a classic result of trying to sharpen a blurred image.
Blur is blur I'm afraid, it cannot be cured.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 08:12 PM
|
#2487
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
Posts: 3,647
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas2
|
Afraid so, yes. Like this it's just a building.
Think of it this way...if you didn't know that Lufthansa was an airline would you think that this was an aviation derived subject ?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 01:12 PM
|
#2490
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kigo3
|
it isn't runway, it's ramp
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 03:25 PM
|
#2491
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rome,ITALY
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by llpilch
it isn't runway, it's ramp
|
technically is a taxiway and there is no category with taxiway. But thanks for the reply llpilch 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 06:15 PM
|
#2492
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 20
|
Hello, this was rejected for Soft and Bad Color. What can I do to correct the color? And is the whole airplane soft or just some parts of it? Because I think the titles, cheat lines and even the registration around the nose gear looks fine.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2743235
Thank You!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 07:35 PM
|
#2493
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich Kloten - LSZH
Posts: 8,777
|
Just adjust the whitepoint and then add some contrast. This will a) correct the colors and b) make the photo look sharper
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 09:19 PM
|
#2494
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LX-A343
Just adjust the whitepoint and then add some contrast. This will a) correct the colors and b) make the photo look sharper
|
Thank You so much Gerardo!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2009, 12:50 PM
|
#2495
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11
|
This photo was rejected, for soft, and contrast, even though i cant see where its soft and lacks contrast. How can i fix it?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2743155
Thanks
Aaron
Last edited by aaronacw; 11-08-2009 at 11:12 PM.
Reason: added info
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2009, 04:56 PM
|
#2496
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
|
I'm not sure how to proceed with this one. Was just rejected for worng/missing catagories, but I'm not sure which one/s.
This is a dedicated air ambulance that really doesn't fit into any of the catagories, so a little insight would be much appreciated.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2746370
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2009, 05:41 PM
|
#2497
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich Kloten - LSZH
Posts: 8,777
|
This aircraft needs the "Business Jet" category.
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2009, 05:50 PM
|
#2498
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
|
Thanks much!
|
|
|
|
|
11-09-2009, 10:27 AM
|
#2499
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,677
|
Aaron,
The fact that this pic is totally backlit and doesn't have the right exposure leads to a very bad contrast and dark along with an overexposed sky around the sun. Not much you can do to improve it I'm afraid
Regards
Alex
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 01:33 AM
|
#2500
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11
|
Thanks very much, I liked the effect
Aaron
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 AM.
|
