11-03-2009, 09:20 AM
|
#4861
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 8
|
Last edited by angus0829; 11-03-2009 at 10:40 AM.
Reason: Missed out one of the URL
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 01:14 PM
|
#4862
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 24
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 02:48 PM
|
#4863
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: EHAM/SPL
Posts: 1,006
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RND17
|
Randy,
She looks soft at the tail and blurred at the nose wich is unfixable so this one is one for your own collecting I think.
Rgds,
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 02:50 PM
|
#4864
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: EHAM/SPL
Posts: 1,006
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
|
She indeed suffers from some blur and she is very soft. A no go I'm afraid.
rgds,
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 05:20 PM
|
#4865
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15
|
Hi,
do you think these shots are too dark?
Thank you!
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 07:25 PM
|
#4866
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chamer
Thanks Florian I thought the new terminal would be of interest as it is the biggest airport project in the country since 1972 and in order to show the check-in portion of the building I can't include ramp or aircraft.
I respect your opinion and i really appreciate your time but I have seen lots of these types of pictures on the site and I can't really see want is different about this one. If you have some more time or maybe one of your collegues could you expand.
Thanks again
|
I have never been a big fan of terminal pictures, but in some the composition just works. I find the building to the right very distracting as it is obscuring the main terminal. Every screener has his personal taste, I just see loads of cars and buses and a small sign on the building to the right, saying "Terminal". Some terminal shots are nicely composed and just "work", unfortunately yours doesn't work for me I'm sorry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by angus0829
|
#1: big NO, obstruction/clutter + motive
#2: soft, heat-distortion
#3: soft and lacks contrast and sharpness
#4: heat-dist., blurry, quality
#5: blurry, compression, quality,heat-dist.
#6: soft, heat-dist., contrast
Sorry, none of them will make it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by llpilch
|
#1: The glare above the tail needs to be removed.
#2: The tarmac looks awfully soft and overprocessed, did you use noise reduction?
#3: Same here, try to use less noise reduction.
@I-PISE:
The Easyjet could be brighter and a tad sharper.
The Croatia is soft and blurry.
Florian
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2009, 10:07 PM
|
#4868
|
|
JPElite Member!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boeingfreak
I have never been a big fan of terminal pictures, but in some the composition just works. I find the building to the right very distracting as it is obscuring the main terminal. Every screener has his personal taste, I just see loads of cars and buses and a small sign on the building to the right, saying "Terminal". Some terminal shots are nicely composed and just "work", unfortunately yours doesn't work for me I'm sorry.
|
Thanks again Florian unforchantly there is nowhere in the airport to get a shot without cars and buses of Terminal 2. Because of the light and the fact there is no picture showing the full terminal, I am leaving it to be screened . I know if it gets in there will be alot of Irish visitors who will be very interested in it. I now understand your misgivings and agree it is pity the carpark is in the way but I still feel it is worthy of publishing
Best regards and thanks for your help 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2009, 11:01 AM
|
#4869
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chamer
Thanks again Florian unforchantly there is nowhere in the airport to get a shot without cars and buses of Terminal 2. Because of the light and the fact there is no picture showing the full terminal, I am leaving it to be screened . I know if it gets in there will be alot of Irish visitors who will be very interested in it. I now understand your misgivings and agree it is pity the carpark is in the way but I still feel it is worthy of publishing
Best regards and thanks for your help |
You're welcome mate
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltbaspotter
|
First link doesn't work, second one should be OK (if I haven't missed any dustspots).
Florian
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2009, 04:14 PM
|
#4870
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2009, 07:45 PM
|
#4871
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: LTBA Istanbul TURKEY
Posts: 64
|
First link doesn't work, second one should be OK (if I haven't missed any dustspots).
Florian[/quote]
Hello Florian
Right link is here
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2751045
__________________
Best Regards
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2009, 08:53 PM
|
#4872
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich Kloten - LSZH
Posts: 8,777
|
1. still blurry and soft. This photo is a no-go, as you can't correct a blurry shot
2. Looks OK
3. Still soft and black border on bottom right, perhaps from rotating the photo?
4. lacks contrast, the weather sure didn't help either
5. oversharpened and showing some JPG compression, also background looks something like window reflections
Quote:
Originally Posted by meus
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2009, 06:54 PM
|
#4874
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 88
|
Could a crew member offer some advice for this terminal shot please?
Is it terminal or not !!
Regards,
MOB.
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2009, 06:56 PM
|
#4875
|
|
JetPhotos.Net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: near EHAM/AMS
Posts: 1,750
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltbaspotter
|
The guy on the left is rather prominent in view, it distracts from the rest of the image. Also I think he is too much recognizable. So for me it is a motive reject. Have you got an image taken more from behind in the cabin?
Quote:
Originally Posted by makinnen75
|
I have trouble to find the right focus in this image, some parts are soft, (primarily the front part) but I can also see jaggies appear. So I am afraid it is one for your personal collection.
cheers, Pamela
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2009, 07:34 PM
|
#4877
|
|
Jetphotos.net Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Zurich
Posts: 988
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MOB
Could a crew member offer some advice for this terminal shot please?
Is it terminal or not !!
Regards,
MOB.
|
I'd say it's an airport overview shot. You should add some contrast and brightness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose Luis Silva
|
Looks ok to me José Luis.
__________________
Last edited by magic48; 11-05-2009 at 07:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2009, 07:40 PM
|
#4878
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 88
|
Magic48
Thankyou for the swift responce, Gianluca - I will act on it.
Regards,
Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2009, 09:11 PM
|
#4879
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lins/Sao Paulo/Brazil
Posts: 303
|
Thanks a lot for your time and attention, Gianluca.
Best regards
José Luís
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2009, 10:11 PM
|
#4880
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: LTBA Istanbul TURKEY
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdeboer
The guy on the left is rather prominent in view, it distracts from the rest of the image. Also I think he is too much recognizable. So for me it is a motive reject. Have you got an image taken more from behind in the cabin?
cheers, Pamela
|
Hmm
Yes I have another one maybe I can send this one.
Thank you Pamela
__________________
Best Regards
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:29 AM.
|
