Welcome to "Aircraft Types and Other Photo Data"

[tra738]

I didn't know that, thanks a lot degi!

Tra738

[kanehoshi]

This shot should be Category: Airport - Terminal?

Rgds,
kanehoshi

[RCoulter]

Would fire tankers be cargo? Because only N425DF had "Cargo" checked by default...

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2191176

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2191185

[brianw999]

Would fire tankers be cargo? Because only N425DF had "Cargo" checked by default...

Hmmmm ? Difficult one because USAF/RAF etc. refuellers are not considered cargo.
I would say....select the cargo category and leave a note to the screeners asking them to delete it if they feel that it is inappropriate.

[RCoulter]

Hmmmm ? Difficult one because USAF/RAF etc. refuellers are not considered cargo.
I would say....select the cargo category and leave a note to the screeners asking them to delete it if they feel that it is inappropriate.

Will do, thanks Brian

[RCoulter]

Is there any way to add a note to the screeners without having to re-upload and end up farther back in the queue?

[ErwinS]

IMO Those fire bombers don't qualify as cargo. They are not hauling cargo but a load to drop it somewhere. If we would had a Bomber cat, than you had o select that one

[ErwinS]

This shot should be Category: Airport - Terminal?

Rgds,
kanehoshi

I think it will be more a ramp overview. It's surely not an terminal

[brianw999]

Is there any way to add a note to the screeners without having to re-upload and end up farther back in the queue?

Unfortunately not.

EDIT: You could put a line to that effect in the photographers' notes and hope that the screener sees it. If it's accepted then you could go back to it and delete the note.

[RCoulter]

Unfortunately not.

EDIT: You could put a line to that effect in the photographers' notes and hope that the screener sees it. If it's accepted then you could go back to it and delete the note.

OK I will do that, thanks again

[RCoulter]

IMO Those fire bombers don't qualify as cargo. They are not hauling cargo but a load to drop it somewhere. If we would had a Bomber cat, than you had o select that one

Now I am confused, since I haven't heard a solid yes or no. I guess I will just uncheck cargo since I also agree that they really aren't cargo planes.

Thanks Erwin

[yash777]

Hey guys i recently got 1 pic accepted without a registration number.





I have another pic of some vintage Mig-23s for which i neither have the registration number nor the C/N.Will they be acceptable?

[ErwinS]

Hey guys i recently got 1 pic accepted without a registration number.





I have another pic of some vintage Mig-23s for which i neither have the registration number nor the C/N.Will they be acceptable?

If those Flogger's don't have any markings on them they will be accepted without a reg nr or c/n. Maybe they a are traceable. On wich location are those MiG's??

[yash777]

They are located in my university(National aerospace university KhAI).They have some numbers on them but i guess they are the squadron numbers.
Another registration CCCP-67178. Aircraft type LET 410UVP turbojet right? Construction number?

[ErwinS]

They are located in my university(National aerospace university KhAI).They have some numbers on them but i guess they are the squadron numbers.
Another registration CCCP-67178. Aircraft type LET 410UVP turbojet right? Construction number?

I did a search for those MiG's but I can't find any registration that belongs to them. They will be accepted without registration. If you want to be sure, leave a remark for the screeners that there is no registration on the aircraft.

CCCP-67178 is a LET-410UVP Turbolet with c/n 790214

Rgds,