Old 07-07-2012, 05:43 PM   #1
B757300
Senior Member
 
B757300's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CLL
Posts: 1,123
Default United Beings Cutting IAH

United Airlines is cutting nonstop service from George Bush Intercontinental Airport to Paris and several other cities, as it begins to make good on its threat to cut service after the city approved Southwest Airlines' proposal to open Hobby Airport for international commercial flights.

Beginning in September when the Chicago-based carrier moves to its fall schedule, it will suspend the daily non-stop flight from Houston to Paris that Continental Airlines began offering in 1992. United became the world's largest airline when it merged with Houston-based Continental in 2010.

Earlier this year, United fought Southwest's Hobby proposal, arguing it would reduce connecting traffic at Bush Intercontinental and thus harm the big airport's growth as a hub.

Besides Paris, United will cut other destinations it now serves from IAH, its largest hub: Waco; Greensboro and Asheville, N.C.; Toluca, Mazatlán and Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico; and Aruba. Service to those locations is a mixture of United and United Express regional service.

The last United nonstop flight to Paris' Charles de Gaulle Airport will leave Oct. 8, United spokeswoman Mary Clark said. The first route cut will be Tuxtla Gutiérrez in September.

Clark said United had continued to offer service to the unprofitable locations, hoping they would turn around as Bush Intercontinental grows, but was prompted to nix them after the Houston City Council's approval of Southwest's Hobby proposal.

As part of that deal, Southwest agreed to pay for a customs facility and five-gate expansion at Hobby so it could begin flying in 2015 to the Caribbean and Latin America.

Clark said the Paris route hadn't been profitable for more than two years.

"With Hobby operating internationally, we don't feel we have the same growth prospects at IAH we had in the past," she said. "So we don't expect these flights to become profitable.

"Our most prudent path is to eliminate the unprofitable flying now rather than continue to lose money."

Within hours of the council's 16-1 vote on May 30, United sent out a bulletin to its employees saying it would reduce planned operations at Bush Intercontinental by 10 percent and eliminate 1,300 Houston jobs starting this fall. It immediately canceled a planned nonstop flight from Houston to Auckland, New Zealand.

http://www.chron.com/business/articl...ll-3689090.php

I predicted that United would begin to reduce IAH after they consumed Continental. I would not be surprised to see them eventually say "FU" to Houston and ditch IAH as a hub, just like Delta did to DFW.

Now they're just throwing a temper tantrum because they can no longer intimidate the Houston City Council into keeping Southwest from operating international flights.
__________________
“Still- If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” -Sir Winston Churchill
B757300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 06:01 PM   #2
Peter Kesternich
Member
 
Peter Kesternich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 890



Default

Cutting IAH-Paris in response to Hobby becoming an international airport to me seems like United were just waiting for a an opportunity to shut down a loss-making route and then blame somebody else for it.
__________________








Peter Kesternich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 06:57 PM   #3
B757300
Senior Member
 
B757300's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CLL
Posts: 1,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kesternich View Post
Cutting IAH-Paris in response to Hobby becoming an international airport to me seems like United were just waiting for a an opportunity to shut down a loss-making route and then blame somebody else for it.
Perhaps, but it is extremely childish nonetheless. They are also cutting other flights, and the rumors out of Houston are it will be a lot more in the coming weeks and months. United basically told Houston that if they allowed SWA to fly international from Hobby, then Houston was going to "pay for it."

Funny how that route did well under Continental, and Air France has no problem with it, but for some reason United can't hack it. Maybe because United SUCKS and the former Continental passengers are going elsewhere.
__________________
“Still- If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” -Sir Winston Churchill
B757300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 08:41 PM   #4
SAMRPICS
Member
 
SAMRPICS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Manchester (Knutsford)
Posts: 380



Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B757300 View Post

Funny how that route did well under Continental, and Air France has no problem with it, but for some reason United can't hack it. Maybe because United SUCKS and the former Continental passengers are going elsewhere.
So true, ive heard terrible things about United, such a shame Continental is gone as i heard great things about them.
__________________
SAMRPICS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 09:20 PM   #5
vikma4
Junior Member
 
vikma4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 20
Default Good for United...

I'm glad to see United making an executive decision based on the facts. The problem is simple: if they can foresee that the IAH-CDG route won't be profitable in the coming years, they should indeed axe that route and re-route their customers through EWR, IAD, or ORD on their way to CDG. I can't blame them; heck if I was in that position and I saw Southwest threatening my business ventures, I would take on the exact same course of action.
...lol Southwest stirring up trouble again, as usual...
vikma4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 06:13 AM   #6
B757300
Senior Member
 
B757300's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CLL
Posts: 1,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vikma4 View Post
I'm glad to see United making an executive decision based on the facts. The problem is simple: if they can foresee that the IAH-CDG route won't be profitable in the coming years, they should indeed axe that route and re-route their customers through EWR, IAD, or ORD on their way to CDG. I can't blame them; heck if I was in that position and I saw Southwest threatening my business ventures, I would take on the exact same course of action.
...lol Southwest stirring up trouble again, as usual...
Southwest is not flying to Paris or adding flights to the other cities being cut. SW plans to fly a small number of flights to Latin America and Caribbean out of HOU. It is highly unlikely that it is going to have any affect at all on IAH-CDG.

This is United throwing a temper tantrum and burning up the last remnant of goodwill remaining in the city of Houston. Houstonians for the most part loved Continental; most now despise United.
__________________
“Still- If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” -Sir Winston Churchill
B757300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 12:56 AM   #7
saupatel
Member
 
saupatel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 529



Send a message via Yahoo to saupatel
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMRPICS View Post
So true, ive heard terrible things about United, such a shame Continental is gone as i heard great things about them.
For the first time a few weeks back I decided to try out United for a cross-country flight. After seeing what a scam they run, I wont be flying them anymore even if they are cheaper.

By the way, what international service is southwest going to offer from hobby.
__________________
saupatel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 06:10 AM   #8
B757300
Senior Member
 
B757300's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CLL
Posts: 1,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMRPICS View Post
So true, ive heard terrible things about United, such a shame Continental is gone as i heard great things about them.
From "First to Worst"
__________________
“Still- If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” -Sir Winston Churchill
B757300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright JetPhotos.Net 2003-2011