Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY. - JetPhotos.Net Forums

BA747-436 · 03-12-2006, 05:20 PM

It seems allot of you would like a second opinion, or even a third from screeners regarding photos your are not entirely sure about uploading either for quality or motive reasons. Therefore we have devised this thread purely to give you advice on any editing or changes that the screeners feel could benefit the photo or advice from us to you with regards to weather the photo stands a good chance of being accepted.

Please remember this is only our opinion and does not guarantee that your photo will be accepted. The aim of this thread is purely to give you advice and helpful comments from our experienced team of screeners.

This thread will be monitored by screeners throughout the day. So you shouldn't have to wait to long for a reply!

Please note: This thread is only open for screeners to reply to. This has been decided with the aim in mind to keep it as clean, easy to use and clutter free as possible.

Manc · 03-12-2006, 06:09 PM

ok a starter for 10!

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=866180 to soft in parts?

BA747-436 · 03-12-2006, 06:12 PM

The idea is to ask before you put them in the queue

Id say yes overall alittle soft, especialy around the starboard side of the aircraft.

Star Alliance · 03-12-2006, 06:44 PM

What about this one?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=866872
If it isn't good enough, I can remove it from the Queue.

EDIT: It got accepted after all:

PhotoID: 5692803
Photograph © M.Stecker

LX-A343 · 03-12-2006, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by US Airways

What about this one?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=866872
If it isn't good enough, I can remove it from the Queue,

Looks a tad unlevel to me. Don't know, how the screener will judge it.

Gerardo

G-DALE · 03-12-2006, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LX-A343

Looks a tad unlevel to me. Don't know, how the screener will judge it.

Gerardo

Yeah I'd agree Gerardo. Nothing too major but if you want to correct it I'd say tilting it 0.3, if not 0.5 clockwise should do the trick

Dale

egll · 03-12-2006, 08:37 PM

Yep, it is unlevel, the lighting is a little awkward but should be okay for acceptance-just need to rotate clockwise like Dale said.

Matt

BA747-436 · 03-12-2006, 06:57 PM

Look alright, alittle grainy but should be ok

Star Alliance · 03-12-2006, 07:34 PM

Thanks a tonne Dan!

BA747-436 · 03-12-2006, 07:47 PM

Not a problem, glad i can be of help

cja · 03-13-2006, 10:22 AM

Too much noise?
Grey plane, grey sky?
Recycle bin?

Thanks

BA747-436 · 03-13-2006, 10:24 AM

Looks a bit dark a noisy to me Ashley. Not easy to get a good shot out of those conditions and those colours though!

cja · 03-13-2006, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BA747-436

Looks a bit dark a noisy to me Ashley. Not easy to get a good shot out of those conditions and those colours though!

Thought so, no doubt there will be another chance in better conditions sometime in the future but Prestwick is a bit off the beaten track for me.

Thanks

BA747-436 · 03-13-2006, 03:58 PM

If your travelling from Chester, yeah id say!

Electric-Jet · 03-13-2006, 10:09 PM

How about this one?

twr75 · 03-13-2006, 10:45 PM

Boeing744,

Looks to be a little soft. However there appears to be some sort of jpeg artifacts around the edges, and any sort of sharpening will only make these worse. Give the sharpening a go and we'll have another look.

Electric-Jet · 03-13-2006, 10:53 PM

I gave it two more passes of USM. And it just gets worse.

tsentsan · 03-14-2006, 03:52 AM

One other point, IMHO it would receive the badangle rejection. Cant say the Belly shot is much fancied.

LX-A343 · 03-14-2006, 07:57 AM

I wouldn't upload it. The angle is questionable IMO. But above all, it seems soft, underexposed and lacking contrast.

Perhaps you can tweak it in Photoshop, but then there's still the angle, which I personally don't really like.

Cheers
Gerardo

MaxPower · 03-16-2006, 12:28 AM

So the angle is not quite amazing, maybe I should move next time a little more to the left so im completely below the aircraft !

-----------------------

Okey, these ones are in the queue, but I decided to show them here first to our screeners, so I can pull them out in time from the queue, if its not good enough to database standards..

Part missing or good enough ?
Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) » Airbus A340-313X OY-KBC
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=869247

Sharp or not ?
Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) » Airbus A340-313X OY-KBI
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=869238

Too Dark,maybe need more light ?
Varig » McDonnell Douglas MD-11 PP-VTJ
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=868469

Too Dark,maybe need more light ?
Blue1 » British Aerospace Avro RJ100 OH-SAN
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=868467

Slight backlit, front aft ??
Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) » McDonnell Douglas MD-87
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=868466

Thanks for help !