Hi! I got reject for Part of aircraft cut off http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5659913
In this photo there is really a part of the wing is cut off. But I can see from 30 to 50 photos accepted each day with a part of the wing cut off.
Upload guide doesn't explain where cut off is acceptable and where not. Only these four sentences and two broken links (by the way all links with photo examples in upload guide are broken)
3.2 Cut Off
In many cases cropping out parts of the aircraft improves the picture dramatically, but if something has been cut off without a clear motive for doing so it will most likely be rejected. Generally speaking, do not crop through essential parts of the main subject. As a rule of thumb if you want to show a close up of an aircraft, show only the main subject. For example: a photo showing almost the whole aircraft, but with the tail chopped off will most likely be rejected.
Not acceptable photos
http://www.jetphotos.net/members/viewsample.php?id=91
http://www.jetphotos.net/members/viewsample.php?id=89
From this guide I can only found out that "the tail chopped off will most likely be rejected" and I can not see even not acceptable examples because of broken links. So for me the only one source to understand which "Cut off photos" can be accepted is the JP database. As I said before I see dozens "Cut off photos" with part of the wing cut off accepted each day. I uploaded the same style photos and got reject.
I appealed. Here my full appeal text:
Hi! Yes a part of the aircraft is really cut off. And so what? There is hundreds thousand photos in JP database with "part of aircraft cut off". I saw these photos I uploaded the same style photos and I got rejects. Very unclear screening process! Not equal rules applied to equal photos. I'm very disappointed! Here only few examples of photos with "part of aircraft cut off" only for the last 24 hours: http://www.jetphotos.net/photo/8482637 http://www.jetphotos.net/photo/8482780 http://www.jetphotos.net/photo/8482887 From previous periods: http://www.jetphotos.net/photo/8398099 http://www.jetphotos.net/photo/8482410 http://www.jetphotos.net/photo/8481215
My appeal was rejected. Here the full reject text:
Your appeal for photo id 5659913 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >>
>> http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5659913
Admin comment has only the link to my rejected photo. It's not another one my photo it is the same photo that I appealed with the same id 5659913. It's all explanation I've got...
This is why I post this thread.
I still disagree with reject.
And I hope someone can give an explanation.
In this photo there is really a part of the wing is cut off. But I can see from 30 to 50 photos accepted each day with a part of the wing cut off.
Upload guide doesn't explain where cut off is acceptable and where not. Only these four sentences and two broken links (by the way all links with photo examples in upload guide are broken)
3.2 Cut Off
In many cases cropping out parts of the aircraft improves the picture dramatically, but if something has been cut off without a clear motive for doing so it will most likely be rejected. Generally speaking, do not crop through essential parts of the main subject. As a rule of thumb if you want to show a close up of an aircraft, show only the main subject. For example: a photo showing almost the whole aircraft, but with the tail chopped off will most likely be rejected.
Not acceptable photos
http://www.jetphotos.net/members/viewsample.php?id=91
http://www.jetphotos.net/members/viewsample.php?id=89
From this guide I can only found out that "the tail chopped off will most likely be rejected" and I can not see even not acceptable examples because of broken links. So for me the only one source to understand which "Cut off photos" can be accepted is the JP database. As I said before I see dozens "Cut off photos" with part of the wing cut off accepted each day. I uploaded the same style photos and got reject.
I appealed. Here my full appeal text:
Hi! Yes a part of the aircraft is really cut off. And so what? There is hundreds thousand photos in JP database with "part of aircraft cut off". I saw these photos I uploaded the same style photos and I got rejects. Very unclear screening process! Not equal rules applied to equal photos. I'm very disappointed! Here only few examples of photos with "part of aircraft cut off" only for the last 24 hours: http://www.jetphotos.net/photo
My appeal was rejected. Here the full reject text:
Your appeal for photo id 5659913 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >>
>> http://www.jetphotos.net/
Admin comment has only the link to my rejected photo. It's not another one my photo it is the same photo that I appealed with the same id 5659913. It's all explanation I've got...
This is why I post this thread.
I still disagree with reject.
And I hope someone can give an explanation.
Comment