Goodmorning,
Recently I had this photo rejected for obstructing objects
With hunderts of pictures already in the database,from different photographers, all taken at this location, I believe that those very tiny parts of the bridge are really not obstructing, as you can still see all parts of the aircraft clearly.
Taking another shot from this serie doesn't make a diffrence, as there is always another little pilon in sight
Talking stairs of huge lampposts I can understand a rejection like this, but now it is confusing a bit.
OK, It 's very easy to clone out some parts, but I believe that's not the way to deal with it (and can also lead to a rejection).
According to the comment after my appeal, there have been 3 screeners, to decide (including the senior who dealed with my appeal). That means that it is a borderline situation, where one screener would accept and another would reject.
Like to have some screeners input here, just to make sure for everyone how to deal with it.
Regards
Freek
Recently I had this photo rejected for obstructing objects
With hunderts of pictures already in the database,from different photographers, all taken at this location, I believe that those very tiny parts of the bridge are really not obstructing, as you can still see all parts of the aircraft clearly.
Taking another shot from this serie doesn't make a diffrence, as there is always another little pilon in sight
Talking stairs of huge lampposts I can understand a rejection like this, but now it is confusing a bit.
OK, It 's very easy to clone out some parts, but I believe that's not the way to deal with it (and can also lead to a rejection).
According to the comment after my appeal, there have been 3 screeners, to decide (including the senior who dealed with my appeal). That means that it is a borderline situation, where one screener would accept and another would reject.
Like to have some screeners input here, just to make sure for everyone how to deal with it.
Regards
Freek
Comment