Today was rejected the following photo for "Part of aircraft cut off"
In the past days was accepted this two my shot taken the same day.
1: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...092213&nseq=15
2: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...8093415&nseq=8
The first photo was accepted directly in screen.
The second was accepted after appeal, drawing a comparison with the first.
Considering that all three pictures have the same type of crop, I appeal the last reject asking to consider the possibility of accepting the photos in the database; In the appeal I explained that earlier photographs had been accepted and the situations that led to accept them.
The appeal was processing and this is the mail they send back:
Your appeal for photo id 4976311 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >> There is no need to cut off the horizontal stabilizer in this side on photo.
I don't claim that my picture is necessarily accepted but I think it would take a certain linearity of judgment. What do you think?
In the past days was accepted this two my shot taken the same day.
1: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...092213&nseq=15
2: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...8093415&nseq=8
The first photo was accepted directly in screen.
The second was accepted after appeal, drawing a comparison with the first.
Considering that all three pictures have the same type of crop, I appeal the last reject asking to consider the possibility of accepting the photos in the database; In the appeal I explained that earlier photographs had been accepted and the situations that led to accept them.
The appeal was processing and this is the mail they send back:
Your appeal for photo id 4976311 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >> There is no need to cut off the horizontal stabilizer in this side on photo.
I don't claim that my picture is necessarily accepted but I think it would take a certain linearity of judgment. What do you think?
Comment