I can see personal data being used to improve an individual's training or even deciding to terminate a few. But in my QA days, it was not that necessary to look at the WHO. I took my direction from W E Deming whose mantra was "management has to understand the system". That is, understand how tasks are performed in their proper context. No mistake occurs outside the context in which the necessary task is performed. Till you pursue a complete and accurate understanding of that, your fixes don't take. By focusing on WHAT, you take the fear of scapegoating out of the equation. It is a known fact that systems that try to discover "who is at fault", usually produce no lasting improvement. You get pervasive CYA which delivers up false information. And management expends lots of energy and money on dead ends. And lots more cases where a fall guy has to be found.
I'm convinced from my professional work that there's always a WHAT. And lasting improvement requires knowing that. Bad systems produce bad results.
I'm convinced from my professional work that there's always a WHAT. And lasting improvement requires knowing that. Bad systems produce bad results.
Comment