Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello Screeners!
    Are these ok for JP upload? The first one was rejected because the plane was a bit too high in frame; The other two what do you think? Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8375[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8376[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8377[/ATTACH]
    Hello, if possible can any screener tell if these are ok? Thanks again!

    Comment


    • hello
      Are these ok for JP upload?
      Click image for larger version

Name:	pr-abb-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	459.5 KB
ID:	1016409
      Click image for larger version

Name:	n499mc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	740.0 KB
ID:	1016410
      Click image for larger version

Name:	pr-abb-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	543.3 KB
ID:	1016411
      thanks

      Comment


      • Thoughts please?
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4625 (2).JPG
Views:	1
Size:	300.4 KB
ID:	1016412
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3655 (2).JPG
Views:	1
Size:	129.9 KB
ID:	1016413
        Thanks .

        Comment


        • Thoughts please.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3457 (3).JPG
Views:	1
Size:	230.6 KB
ID:	1016414

          Comment


          • This might be a stupid one to even ask about. But... Acceptable?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FJNX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	896.7 KB
ID:	1016416

            Comment


            • How about these? thank you
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0243A-1-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	571.1 KB
ID:	1016417
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0096B-1-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	715.4 KB
ID:	1016418
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0103A-1-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	779.5 KB
ID:	1016419

              Comment


              • Hello, is this photo ok for upload?
                The second photo was already in prescreening with the result of to dark and soft, is it ok now?
                Thank you.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	XX191 Hawk RAF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,001.9 KB
ID:	1016421
                Click image for larger version

Name:	ZK459 RAF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	654.4 KB
ID:	1016422

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
                  Hi,

                  can you prescreen two photos attached below?

                  Many thanks.
                  Marian

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]8393[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]8394[/ATTACH]
                  Second one is a bit soft, otherwise no quality problems.

                  Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
                  Hello again.
                  After my photo of D-HAUV were rejected due to Backlit i´ve processed another picture.
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]8395[/ATTACH]
                  is this acceptable? There is only diffuse light because the sun were behind nearing rainclouds.

                  Thanks again for your time!
                  Have a nice start into the new week
                  I see problems with color, softness, and yes underexposure/contrast.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                    Hello, if possible can any screener tell if these are ok? Thanks again!
                    Quality is ok on all three, though for the first I would choose one without vegetation on the fuselage, and the second has issues with exposure/contrast.

                    Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
                    hello
                    Are these ok for JP upload?
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8397[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8398[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8399[/ATTACH]
                    thanks
                    Unfortunately these all look highly over-processed or compressed. Either you are over editing them, or the sensor in your camera isn't able to handle the challenging lighting conditions.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by kiwikieran View Post
                      Thoughts please?
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8400[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8401[/ATTACH]
                      Thanks .
                      Originally posted by kiwikieran View Post
                      Thoughts please.[ATTACH=CONFIG]8402[/ATTACH]
                      All would be rejected.

                      First because the crop is too wide, second for vignetting and editing halos, and the third for more reasons than you probably want me to list here. Suffice to say, you should probably go through the upload guidelines to see what we consider acceptable for inclusion into the DB.

                      Originally posted by FederalAce View Post
                      This might be a stupid one to even ask about. But... Acceptable?

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]8405[/ATTACH]
                      There are multiple issues with this image, including noise, horizon, centering, color, and compression.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by alfian.massagony View Post
                        How about these? thank you
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8406[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8407[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8408[/ATTACH]
                        All three would be rejected. Very poor light/contrast and noise on the first; color, contrast, noise, and compression on the second two.

                        Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                        Hello, is this photo ok for upload?
                        The second photo was already in prescreening with the result of to dark and soft, is it ok now?
                        Thank you.
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8410[/ATTACH]
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8411[/ATTACH]
                        First is a bit noisy and the color is off (was the sky really that shade of green/cyan?); the second is better than the previous, but the dust spot remains.

                        Comment


                        • How about these?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	15.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	391.7 KB
ID:	1016424

                          thank you

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
                            How about these?

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]8415[/ATTACH]

                            thank you
                            It needs CW rotation.

                            Comment


                            • I already did some corrections like remove dust spots and correct colors. What more I can improve in this image?

                              Thanks

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	27052017-DSC_0165.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	707.4 KB
ID:	1016426

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                All three would be rejected. Very poor light/contrast and noise on the first; color, contrast, noise, and compression on the second two.
                                i tried to fix this. thank you
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0103A-1-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	781.4 KB
ID:	1016427

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X