Hi All, I noticed that in a number of threads here, suspicions are raised that accident investigators may be deliberately holding back evidence, creating false evidence or generally lying to the public. Now my question is ... if I wanted to hide the truth and create a more or less completely fictitious report - how would I do that? Who would decide to do it in the first place? Certainly it will not all be initiated by a single person, so there must be some kind of meeting with a number of people involved, all of which will know what is going on. How many will that be? What is the probability that all of them will remain silent over the years? On the other hand, if some of them talk, will they be regarded as credible? Then on the evidence - suppose I would want to have true evidence removed and false one planted instead - how would I do that? Who would actually do it and again, how many people would need to be involved? Questions... m.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The guide to staging a major conspiracy: How to falsify accident evidence
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Anglo2 View PostPerhaps it is possible. NASA did a similar thing when faking the moon landings, with only those closely involved really knowing whats happening, and every one else (back room staff, public) being told otherwise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mfeldt View PostHi All, I noticed that in a number of threads here, suspicions are raised that accident investigators may be deliberately holding back evidence, creating false evidence or generally lying to the public. Now my question is ... if I wanted to hide the truth and create a more or less completely fictitious report - how would I do that? Who would decide to do it in the first place? Certainly it will not all be initiated by a single person, so there must be some kind of meeting with a number of people involved, all of which will know what is going on. How many will that be? What is the probability that all of them will remain silent over the years? On the other hand, if some of them talk, will they be regarded as credible? Then on the evidence - suppose I would want to have true evidence removed and false one planted instead - how would I do that? Who would actually do it and again, how many people would need to be involved? Questions... m.
If a government doesn't want someone to know something, they can make it happen. My grandfather always said, "Money talks, bullshit walks."
Pull out the cash and mouths will shut.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HalcyonDays View PostI didn't know about that - I always thought the moon landings were real. Do you have a source for that ? How many people do you estimate were involved in "really knowing what was happening" ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anglo2 View PostPerhaps it is possible. NASA did a similar thing when faking the moon landings, with only those closely involved really knowing whats happening, and every one else (back room staff, public) being told otherwise.
Do you own stock in Reynolds?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anglo2 View PostPerhaps it is possible. NASA did a similar thing when faking the moon landings, with only those closely involved really knowing whats happening, and every one else (back room staff, public) being told otherwise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Verbal View PostI strongly advise that everyone in this forum don their tinfoil hats now.
Thanks in advanceYet another AD.com convert!
Comment
-
Originally posted by mawheatley View PostOK I've seen this photo, and that phrase, many times on this forum, but never understood it. Am I being dumb here? Could someone explain it to me? (Word of caution before you call me a complete moron - I did not grow up in the U.S. Living here now for 10yrs, but if it's from a TV show before that timeframe that's probably why I don't get it.)
Thanks in advance
I’m wondering if a conservative jokingly told them about the Faraday cage science was a defense. Anyway I’ve seen interviews with these paranoid delusional Fascist Liberal conspiracy nuts to explain they use the aluminum foil to prevent their minds from being controlled and read.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ATFS_Crash View PostA kind of fashionable delusional paranoia by the lunatic fringe of fascist liberals; that claim the government is trying to use ESP and or electromagnetic waves for mind control.
Originally posted by ATFS_Crash View PostSome of them make makeshift hats out of aluminum foil to try to attempt to prevent the government or some other big sinister agency from controlling their mind.
Originally posted by ATFS_Crash View PostI’m wondering if a conservative jokingly told them about the Faraday cage was a defense. Anyway I’ve seen interviews with these paranoid delusional Fascist Liberal conspiracy nuts to explain they use the aluminum foil to prevent their minds from being controlled and read.
Comment
Comment