Thanks a million! I just learned a ton more about making the right edits to a photo, never thought of the cropping size to take away uninteresting parts of the photo. I will give the photo you did a try, thanks a ton again!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Hi,
Just a couple questions. Re-equalized this guy and I cannot see any dust spots (I often miss a few).
Also, I did not cut anything off here, so what should I do to fix this one in the future?
Thanks for the advice as always.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oliver P. View PostHi,
Just a couple questions. Re-equalized this guy and I cannot see any dust spots (I often miss a few).
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8159/7...72a45f6e_o.jpg
Originally posted by Oliver P. View PostAlso, I did not cut anything off here, so what should I do to fix this one in the future?
Thanks for the advice as always.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fredda9000 View PostGot this one rejected for oversharpen today. I'm having a hard time to find where it's oversharpen. Can anyone please tell me so I can fix it.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3828785
Comment
-
Got this one rejected for over processed with a screener remark of "halos". Now I can see what they mean by over processed and I'll have to do a complete redo of the photo but I've never seen the remark "halos" and can't seem to see what they are talking about with it here.
Comment
-
'Halos' is often used to say there is a halo visible, most around the aircraft, but sometimes also around other structures like a tree line.
In this photo: above the top of the fuselage and around the vertical tail stab you can see a dark area. At the underside of the aircraft and around the wings a lighter area. Together this makes a sort of halo.
cheers, Pamela
Comment
-
Hi guys, first post
Keep getting rejections for undersharpened (soft).
Can someone tell me where this one went wrong?
Thanks
Comment
-
Originally posted by AJ View PostLooks like the culprit is behind the left stab tip.
Nothing to do with 'cut off' parts, it's to do with the ratio. Yours is 1024px × 671px and the minimum is 1024px × 683px.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geo-G View PostHi guys, first post
Keep getting rejections for undersharpened (soft).
Can someone tell me where this one went wrong?
Thanks
I'll let a screener give you the official word, but here is a quick re-edit of your upload. You can really see softness around windows, curves on fuselage and wingroots, titles and designs, anything with detail really. In this shot, it's most notable around the QantasLink and windows. The image might be considered blurry. Also, watch out for unlevel horizons
Hope this helps!
HansLast edited by hdgrubb; 2012-11-24, 02:29.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geo-G View PostHi guys, first post
Keep getting rejections for undersharpened (soft).
Can someone tell me where this one went wrong?
Thanks
Also may i suggest uploading at 1024 pixels wide instead of 1200. The smaller size will make attaining the proper sharpness easier, as flaws stick out less.Sam Rudge
A 5D3, some Canon lenses, the Sigma L and a flash
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atamvir Multani View PostHi this shot got rejected in appeal for missing c/n
I hav filled the c/n and its clearly visible in the c/n column of pic.....any idea y rejecteD???
thanks for ur time
Comment
Comment