<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>JetPhotos.Net Forums - The Friendly Way to Fly - Digital Photo Processing Forum</title>
		<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net</link>
		<description>Have a question about Photo Editing software (Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro, etc.), improving your photos, etc.? Our crew of Photo Screeners is here to help you out!</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:16:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>A Reminder About Digital Manipulation</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48982&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Good Evening JetPhotos Members, 
 
Recently a well known JetPhotos photographer chose to adjust the attitude of a landing aircraft artificially in order to become more dramatic. This was discovered after acceptance and the photo was removed and the photographer reminded, politely, of our rules. 
 
Unfortunately more uploads were then noted with considerable modification that met our definition of digital manipulation. As a result we had no choice but to advise the photographer that he could no longer upload at JetPhotos, a disappointing result. 
 
We feel it is a timely reminder that our expectation is that photos of aircraft on our site are as they were seen by the photographer on the day. Whilst processing of the frame is expected, artificially adjusting colour, aircraft state, registrations or other gross changes cannot be tolerated.  
 
Unfortunately this means that some frames can simply not be accepted to this site. If you take a photo of a subject only to find it is too low in...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Good Evening JetPhotos Members,<br />
<br />
Recently a well known JetPhotos photographer chose to adjust the attitude of a landing aircraft artificially in order to become more dramatic. This was discovered after acceptance and the photo was removed and the photographer reminded, politely, of our rules.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately more uploads were then noted with considerable modification that met our definition of digital manipulation. As a result we had no choice but to advise the photographer that he could no longer upload at JetPhotos, a disappointing result.<br />
<br />
We feel it is a timely reminder that our expectation is that photos of aircraft on our site are as they were seen by the photographer on the day. Whilst processing of the frame is expected, artificially adjusting colour, aircraft state, registrations or other gross changes cannot be tolerated. <br />
<br />
Unfortunately this means that some frames can simply not be accepted to this site. If you take a photo of a subject only to find it is too low in the frame to be accepted simply do not upload it rather than cloning in more foreground at the bottom of the frame!<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				6.4 Manipulation<br />
<br />
Altering of colors, other than adjusting the histogram and contrast is not accepted, for example: giving the sky a yellow cast to fake a sunset sky.<br />
<br />
Black and white photos are only allowed on<br />
<br />
    * scans of B/W negatives/slides<br />
    * vintage aircraft or "vintage look alikes", i.e. retro painting schemes, replicas, etc.<br />
<br />
Any other colour altering, including fake skies, inverting of colours, etc. is not allowed.<br />
<br />
Any other altering during the editing process will be rejected, this means adding things that were not originally in the picture or removing significant elements of the shot. Recent examples are: addition of glare effects, altering of regs, etc.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>Feel free to remove dust spots, but do not manipulate the content of the frame!<br />
<br />
Thank you.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48982</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PC vs. MAC / MAC vs. PC -- Adobe Photoshop</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48977&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone – I have tried researching this subject before posting my question. With your information I hope to make a sound decision. 
  
I have heard many great comments regarding MAC computers for which I am considering switching to a MAC platform from a PC. My preference would be a desktop but I have not ruled out a laptop. 
<O:p 
Does the MAC version of Photoshop provide enhanced processing and increased editing capabilities that are not available on the PC version of Photoshop? In other words, is there a technical and / or hardware advantages over the PC when editing with the MAC version Photoshop or is this just a personal preference with no real inherent processing/editing capabilities other than look and feel?  
<O:p 
Thank you in advance for your kind and informative comments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Hello everyone – I have tried researching this subject before posting my question. With your information I hope to make a sound decision.</font></font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">I have heard many great comments regarding MAC computers for which I am considering switching to a MAC platform from a PC. My preference would be a desktop but I have not ruled out a laptop.</font></font><br />
<O:p<br />
<font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Does the MAC version of Photoshop provide enhanced processing and increased editing capabilities that are not available on the PC version of Photoshop? In other words, is there a technical and / or hardware advantages over the PC when editing with the MAC version Photoshop or is this just a personal preference with no real inherent processing/editing capabilities other than look and feel? </font></font><br />
<O:p<br />
<font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Thank you in advance for your kind and informative comments.</font></font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>Jim Macris</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48977</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Images loseing saturation</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48930&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey guys my images seem to be losing saturation any help? 
  
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6706547&nseq=2 
  
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=39776 
  
Cheers guys]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hey guys my images seem to be losing saturation any help?<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6706547&amp;nseq=2" target="_blank">http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...6706547&amp;nseq=2</a><br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=39776" target="_blank">http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=39776</a><br />
 <br />
Cheers guys</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>Charles022</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48930</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Centering reject</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48923&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi all! 
I have a problem with my second "big killer" (after "contrast"): *centering* 
I have centered the airbus using the low-part of the windows line, as usual. 
This time I have taken a rejection, due to "center". 
How can I improve my picture? 
Thank you in advance, best regards 
Fabrizio Berni - Italy 
 
Image: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2499/4058160175_054ddcf5ef_o.jpg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi all!<br />
I have a problem with my second "big killer" (after "contrast"): <b>centering</b><br />
I have centered the airbus using the low-part of the windows line, as usual.<br />
This time I have taken a rejection, due to "center".<br />
How can I improve my picture?<br />
Thank you in advance, best regards<br />
Fabrizio Berni - Italy<br />
<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2499/4058160175_054ddcf5ef_o.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>thetiz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48923</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Window glare</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48887&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2738974 
 
This shot has just been rejected due to window glare and bad info. The second reason is absolutely right, but for the first I can't understand. First of all there wasn't any window between me and the 757, second it was cloudy. How Is it possible? Probably I don't have understood what they mean wth glare. Thank you very much everybody! 
 
Alessio]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2738974" target="_blank">http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2738974</a><br />
<br />
This shot has just been rejected due to window glare and bad info. The second reason is absolutely right, but for the first I can't understand. First of all there wasn't any window between me and the 757, second it was cloudy. How Is it possible? Probably I don't have understood what they mean wth glare. Thank you very much everybody!<br />
<br />
Alessio</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>ZK-OKH</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48887</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How do YOU level your photo?</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48875&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi all, looking to see what your techniques on leveling photos. Thanks</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi all, looking to see what your techniques on leveling photos. Thanks</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>Frick187</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48875</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blurry or not?</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48863&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello all, 
 
I would like to ask for your opinion on attached pic. 
It's rejected because of being blurry, but it's the motion blur. 
In my opinion the aircraft itself is sharp. 
Please advise 
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2733216 
 
Thanks, 
Joop]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello all,<br />
<br />
I would like to ask for your opinion on attached pic.<br />
It's rejected because of being blurry, but it's the motion blur.<br />
In my opinion the aircraft itself is sharp.<br />
Please advise<br />
<a href="http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2733216" target="_blank">http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2733216</a><br />
<br />
Thanks,<br />
Joop</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>Joop</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48863</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Keep as it is or not?</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48841&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I took this photo at Denham yesterday and was wondering if I should level it or keep it as it is? I'm not used to GA photography as I cant see a reference point to use as a flat bit except for the livery on the aircraft but yet again the angle of photography is not side on.  
 
Original: 
 
Image: http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w302/DME43/DSCF9046.jpg  
 
Rotated and cropped 3:2: 
Image: http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w302/DME43/DSCF90462.jpg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I took this photo at Denham yesterday and was wondering if I should level it or keep it as it is? I'm not used to GA photography as I cant see a reference point to use as a flat bit except for the livery on the aircraft but yet again the angle of photography is not side on. <br />
<br />
Original:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w302/DME43/DSCF9046.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Rotated and cropped 3:2:<br />
<img src="http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w302/DME43/DSCF90462.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
Also is it good as it is or does it need a little tweaking? As I've said, its my first GA shot of my life and its quite different than spotting at LHR :grin:<br />
<br />
thanks!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>iranair777</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48841</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I need help with my Rejected Photo!!</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48838&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone, I have recently got this photo rejected due to it being undersharpened (soft).  
 
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2728657 
 
I have Adobe PS CS3 but I am no expert at it. What would the experts say I should use (tools and skills) in order to make it sharper, and thus making it acceptable to the db? 
 
Greatly appreciate anyone's responses! 
Aulia Harun 
------------- 
Nikon D90]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello everyone, I have recently got this photo rejected due to it being undersharpened (soft). <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2728657" target="_blank">http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2728657</a><br />
<br />
I have Adobe PS CS3 but I am no expert at it. What would the experts say I should use (tools and skills) in order to make it sharper, and thus making it acceptable to the db?<br />
<br />
Greatly appreciate anyone's responses!<br />
Aulia Harun<br />
-------------<br />
Nikon D90<br />
AF-S Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G VR IF-ED<br />
AF Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G<br />
AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>boeing773er</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48838</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Airport or Shopping mall?</title>
			<link>http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48828&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:23:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear all, 
I have 1 photo reject  
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2725868 
by reason: Bad Motive and Admin Comments: to much foreground pavement and it looks like a shopping  mall and not an airport. 
 
but I also have 1 photo Noi Bai Airport took in day time: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6374959&nseq=14 
 
With you, do you think my shot is Airport or shopping mall? 
 
Thank for your comments!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Dear all,<br />
I have 1 photo reject <br />
<a href="http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2725868" target="_blank">http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2725868</a><br />
by reason: Bad Motive and Admin Comments: to much foreground pavement and it looks like a shopping  mall and not an airport.<br />
<br />
but I also have 1 photo Noi Bai Airport took in day time: <a href="http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6374959&amp;nseq=14" target="_blank">http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...374959&amp;nseq=14</a><br />
<br />
With you, do you think my shot is Airport or shopping mall?<br />
<br />
Thank for your comments!<br />
Rgds,</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.jetphotos.net/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Digital Photo Processing Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>kanehoshi</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=48828</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
