PDA

View Full Version : Little help with these photo - category

biosdi
03-27-2010, 12:41 PM
Hi all.

I would need some help with these rejected photo:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929815
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929806
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929793
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929784

About A319CJ photo I just discovered that I have to tick "business jet", right?

But, about Falcon 50? why "category wrong or missing?" In the first link there is also "bad motive". Any help?

Thank you very much

Alessandro Scagliusi
brianw999
03-27-2010, 05:39 PM
Hi all.

I would need some help with these rejected photo:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929815
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929806
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929793
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2929784

About A319CJ photo I just discovered that I have to tick "business jet", right?

But, about Falcon 50? why "category wrong or missing?" In the first link there is also "bad motive". Any help?
Alessandro Scagliusi
Thank you very much

1. Bad motive refers to the drastic use of wideangle and the viewpoint of the aircraft.
2. Needs Business Jet category.
3. Needs Business Jet category.
4. The image is dark. You used f4 aperture and this has resulted in insufficient depth of field to keep all of the image in focus. Attempts to sharpen it have caused jaggies to appear in the stripe halfway up the tail fin.
biosdi
03-28-2010, 02:05 AM
1. Bad motive refers to the drastic use of wideangle and the viewpoint of the aircraft.
2. Needs Business Jet category.
3. Needs Business Jet category.
4. The image is dark. You used f4 aperture and this has resulted in insufficient depth of field to keep all of the image in focus. Attempts to sharpen it have caused jaggies to appear in the stripe halfway up the tail fin.

Thanks a lot for explainations...

Do you think that 1. and 4. can be modified or they are unusable?

Thanks again
LX-A343
03-28-2010, 04:10 AM
Nope, composition on nr. 1 and lack of depth of field in nr. 4 cannot be corrected anymore.