Welcome to "Aircraft Types and Other Photo Data" [Archive] - JetPhotos.Net Forums

04-23-2007, 11:43 PM

Welcome to the Forum dedicated to the data attached to your photos.

Our aim is to help you prevent 'Bad Info' and 'Categories' rejections in the future by allowing queries about Aircraft, Airlines, Locations, Genres and so on to be answered in one central location.

Many members ask why the information is important at all. Well, we have modeled JetPhotos into an aviation resource. Since the addition of Bill Harm's census our photo database and census are linked allowing enthusiasts to check the data on the aircraft they are viewing. We are proud of the standard we have achieved and need our Member's help to continue.

This does mean we have to put the onus for correct information onto the uploader. We have made it much easier with the 'Auto-Fill' on the upload page, however bad info in, bad info out and some erroneous data does get past our eagle eyed screeners.

I look forward to your questions and also your input to these threads. Please be careful when offering others advise as we need to ensure any data given is true to the JetPhotos.net database, not the format used by other websites.

Let's reduce those 'Bad Info' and 'Categories' rejects!

Star Alliance

04-28-2007, 01:48 AM

Holy smokes, when did this come out!?
I totally missed this forum until just now.
Nice idea, brass.

04-28-2007, 04:57 AM

I set it up on the 23rd of April, I hope it's useful to you!

Kathysto

11-13-2007, 08:33 AM

Hello, I hope this is the right thread to post my question and that it has not been discussed earlier in other threads.

Recently I took a pic of D-AGEL, a plane flying in the livery of Hapag-Lloyd Express. Filling in the registration in the Auto-Fill data field I got three airlines then, in the first place TUIfly, in the second place Hapag-Lloyd Express and in the third place Germania. Well, I think we can drop Germania quickly and concentrate on both other possibilities.

My question is: what item is more important for the decision which airline has to be filled in? The actual livery or the actual airline? The airline TUIfly was founded in January 2007 and consists of Hapag-Lloyd Express and Hapagfly, so in the strict sense the brands of Hapag-Lloyd Express and Hapag-Lloyd.com and Hapagfly do not exist anymore, but the liveries are still around. Looking at the pictures of D-AGEL in this database, you can find both airline names. Here are two nice pics added recently:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6107504&nseq=0
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6088130&nseq=1

In another well known database you only find Hapag-Lloyd Express and in brackets Germania.

Personally speaking I would tend to use the airline's name that you can find painted on the aircraft. This solution with brackets is in my opinion quite good, because it takes into account all factors, e.g. for my 'problem' it could be Hapag-Lloyd Express (TUIfly) or vice versa. So you do not lose i.e. the origin of an airline or a hybrid livery. What do you think?

I think this would be helpful also for planes which are leased and wear additions like 'powered by' or 'operated by'.
Or which were leased, painted in another scheme or a hybrid scheme and then came back to the original airline and have not been repainted.

Two other examples freely chosen from our database (hybrid schemes) are:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5851935&nseq=53
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5940577&nseq=8

An example from my own pics:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5929712

I know that my examples would not end up in a rejection, but maybe we can avoid confusion about this item or just make it clearer.

I hope this is of any general interest and I am looking forward to the discussion,

regards Kay

11-13-2007, 08:40 AM

Kay, please use the current airline, TUIfly. It is also reflected in the Census.
http://www.jetphotos.net/census/aircraft2.php?msnid=737NG-28110

Kathysto

11-13-2007, 09:01 AM

Hi AJ,

thank you for that quick reply. This first part of my question is answered and there is no vagueness left.

But what about those hybrid schemes/leased aircrafts? In the case of the Santa Barbara Airlines 763 you can't find information about the leasing to SBA and the aircraft has returned to LOT now. Wouldn't it be nicer to get information where they leased it from? I think most users would recognize that there is something 'wrong' with the (hybrid LOT) livery and the polish registration...together with a Venezuelan airline ;-)
Sorry to be so obtrusive, but I am not satisfied at all with this point.

Thank you again for replying,

Kay

11-13-2007, 08:14 PM

Our standard is to list the operator of the aircraft (not necessarily the owner). In the case of leased aircraft this will often mean two airlines are listed. Here are some examples:
Delta Connection (Atlantic Southeast Airlines)
GIRjet (Loftleiðir Icelandic)
Austrian arrows (Tyrolean Airways)
Lufthansa Regional (CityLine)
The airline is brackets is operating the aircraft for the airline listed, normally in the lessor's livery or a hybrid livery.
Using Santa Bárbara Airlines as an example they are leasing an aircraft from Icelandair so this is how it appears in the database:
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?airline=Santa%20B%E1rbara%20Airlines%20(Icelandair)

Kathysto

11-13-2007, 08:38 PM

Thanks again for making this clear, AJ!

One last question: who can add (or suggest) e.g. a lessor (in brackets) to the current operator (http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5851935&nseq=53.)? (http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5851935&nseq=53.%29?)
In this case it should or could be TravelSpan (Excel Airways)?

Greetings, Kay

11-13-2007, 09:20 PM

Ah, in the case you have chosen is is not a case of two airlines, it is a case of an airline operating for a travel company. It should appear only as Excel Airways (now XL Airways).

An example of this is [photoid=6080637] where it does not appear as Travel City Direct (Air Atlanta Icelandic), it is just Air Atlanta Icelandic.

11-13-2007, 09:21 PM

PS there is an airline specific thread on this forum: Bad Info - Airline
http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=38614

Kathysto

11-14-2007, 08:33 AM

Well, I think I got the important things right about this topic. Thank you for the further examples. I'm glad that there is a thread dealing with these questions.
Greetings from HAM,
Kay

kanehoshi

12-21-2007, 10:02 AM

Hi AJ,

Can you tell me what kind this heli because I don't know much about Heli of Military.
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m312/kanehoshi/HU_41853-1.jpg

Thank you very much !
Brgds,
kanehoshi

12-21-2007, 10:27 AM

Hi, it's a Fuji UH-1J Iroquois.

kanehoshi

12-22-2007, 09:45 AM

Hi, it's a Fuji UH-1J Iroquois.
Thanks AJ, but I go to add your photos and in the menu go to FUJI aircraft and I couldn't find UH-1J Iroquois, Do you mind to tell me how to up load that photo.
Many thanks !
Brgds,
kanehoshi

Russian_watson

01-07-2008, 12:02 PM

Hello! Yesterday I took photo of RA-42418, ex-Samara Airlines (according current photos at JP.net).
My main problem is - I cant upload photo because new airline "Groznyi-Avia" still not added to airlines list. When I tryed to add this new airline, I got message that its already submitted for adding.
As I told before, I want to upload photo which looks as "hot-photo" and I simply would like to know, how long I should wait for "Groznyi-Avia" in airlines list.

Thansk!
Regards, Maxim

P.S. Sorry for my poor English.

01-07-2008, 06:07 PM

I have added Groznyi-Avia for you.

Russian_watson

01-07-2008, 06:37 PM

Thank You very much! :)

Regards, Maxim

paulc

02-26-2008, 02:11 PM

AJ - how will JP deal with aircraft built under license or where a manufacturer has been taken over. ie F16 / F104 & several others have been built by companies who were not the original manufacturer/design authority.

kanehoshi

04-26-2008, 01:46 PM

Hi,
Someone help me about this aircraft
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q130/kanemottohoshi/RP-C5988.jpg
Thks,

LX-A343

04-26-2008, 04:05 PM

Hi,
Someone help me about this aircraft
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q130/kanemottohoshi/RP-C5988.jpg
Thks,
Which one???

z740

04-26-2008, 05:55 PM

Which one???
The one in the picture.:lol:

-Chris

kanehoshi

04-27-2008, 06:52 PM

Which one???
This one : RP-C5988
- type aircraft?
- C/N?
rgds,

LX-A343

04-27-2008, 07:35 PM

Call me dumb, but .....

http://www.jetphotos.net/user-uploads/post0101b.jpg

... I don't see a picture.

LX-A343

04-27-2008, 08:13 PM

Sorry, that was weird. I couldn't see any photo in kanehoshi's post, as shown with the screenshot. But that was a mistake in Firefox, which now has been corrected ... NOW, I can see the photo .... even in the quoted text ;-)

kanehoshi

04-30-2008, 07:47 AM

No body know ?
Reg : RP-C5988
Type: ?
C/N:?

04-30-2008, 08:34 AM

It's an IAI Westwind (or late build Jet Commander). I can't find a CN I'm afraid.

Top_Gun

05-22-2008, 02:51 AM

What would I use to upload a photo of Helicopter N55TV Channel 5 news out of Boston. What would I use for an airline also?

This is the info I see for the type, but I don't see Aerospatiale AS350B in a drop down menu. When I searched for AS350B for pictures, I see

Aircraft (FAA)
Manufacturer: Aerospatiale
Model: AS350B Search all Aerospatiale AS350B
Year built: 0000
Serial Number (C/N): 1660
Mode S Code: 51577317
Aircraft Type: Rotorcraft
Amateur-Built: No
Number of Seats: 6
Number of Engines: 1
Engine Type: Turbo-shaft

Owner (FAA)
Registration Type: Corporation
Owner: U S Helicopters Inc
Address: Marshville, NC 28103-0625
United States
Region: Eastern

thanks!

05-22-2008, 09:04 AM

Hi Dave,

Airline: US Helicopter
Aircraft: Aérospatiale > Aérospatiale Ecureuil > Aérospatiale AS 350B Ecureuil

Top_Gun

05-23-2008, 02:53 AM

thanks!

oe-vap

06-13-2008, 05:40 AM

Hi all,

I couldnt find any info about this helicopter.
http://www.airteamimages.com/pics/70/70818_200.jpg
Click (http://www.airteamimages.com/70818.html)

The prefix ZK-H doesn't seem to be correct in this case as the New zealand register ( http://www.caa.govt.nz/Script/Air_Reg_Query.asp ) shows a Kawasaki BK117 B-1 but thats incorrect for sure.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks

06-13-2008, 10:21 AM

oe-vap

06-13-2008, 10:25 AM

Thank you for the answer.

Michel

07-03-2008, 12:28 PM

Hi all,
can somebody help me with this rejection: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1994857

I found this airplane under both genre's on jetphotos.net so I selected the genre militairy and I didn't selected any categories.

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="28%">Reason(s) for Rejection:
- Categories wrong or missing
- Bad Info

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Can somebody tell me which genre and category I must select for this picture?

Extra info:

Airline: Private
Aircraft: North American OV-10B Bronco
Location: Leeuwarden Air Base - EHLW
Country: Netherlands
Registration: F-AZKM

degi

07-03-2008, 12:51 PM

Michel: Genre: Civilian, Category: Warbird/Vintage

Michel

07-05-2008, 04:29 PM

Michel: Genre: Civilian, Category: Warbird/Vintage
Uploaded the picture again with above genre and category...thanks.

RCoulter

07-06-2008, 07:30 PM

How do I fill put the "Aircraft" part of the form if I don't have the reg or know the exact model of 737?

http://machimages.com/temp/JP.net/20070517-WN-EDIT07052008.jpg

I know it is a Southwest plane, but I couldn't get the reg even after I upped the exposure...

07-06-2008, 11:28 PM

RCoulter

07-06-2008, 11:51 PM

Leave the registration field blank and select 'Boeing 737-7H4' from the aircraft menu.
Ok, will do. Thanks :cool:

kanehoshi

07-09-2008, 02:44 AM

Hi All,
Please help me :
Airline: Jetstar Pacific Airlines
Registration: VN-A194
Aircraft: ?
C/N: ?

Thanks,

kanehoshi

07-10-2008, 06:03 AM

Dear all,
Nobody No infor of VN-A194???

http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m312/kanehoshi/VN-A194_1A.jpg

rgds,

brianw999

07-10-2008, 08:29 PM

VN-A194 ? It's a B737-400 leased from ??? since May 2008 (source = wikipedia )

I'll try to find more but don't hold your breath.

07-11-2008, 06:43 AM

Hi All,
Please help me :
Airline: Jetstar Pacific Airlines
Registration: VN-A194
Aircraft: ?
C/N: ?

Thanks,
http://www.jetphotos.net/census/aircraft2.php?msnid=737-25850

brianw999

07-11-2008, 11:31 AM

Ah, another lesson learned. Just because it's not in the database doesn't mean it's not in the census then. Didn't know that !!

tra738

08-13-2008, 09:07 AM

Hi,

I want to upload a picture of an aircraft that is not in the database yet, but the aircraft type is not in the dropdown-menu.

More details:
Registration: D-EACJ
Aircraft type: Reims-Cessna FR.172G Rocket
Cn: 0183

I can find the Reims-Cessna in the dropdown-menu, but I can't find the -G Rocket type. I don't know how to add a new aircraft type to the dropdown-menu.

Help much appreciated!

Cheers, Tra738

degi

08-13-2008, 09:18 AM

There's a form linked at the aircraft field in the upload form where you can request a new aircraft type.

tra738

08-13-2008, 09:22 AM

I didn't know that, thanks a lot degi!

Tra738

kanehoshi

09-29-2008, 07:53 AM

This shot should be Category: Airport - Terminal?
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q130/kanemottohoshi/VVNB-TER.jpg
Rgds,
kanehoshi

RCoulter

10-30-2008, 02:54 AM

Would fire tankers be cargo? Because only N425DF had "Cargo" checked by default...

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2191176
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2191185

brianw999

10-30-2008, 09:28 AM

Would fire tankers be cargo? Because only N425DF had "Cargo" checked by default...

Hmmmm ? Difficult one because USAF/RAF etc. refuellers are not considered cargo.
I would say....select the cargo category and leave a note to the screeners asking them to delete it if they feel that it is inappropriate.

RCoulter

10-30-2008, 01:00 PM

Hmmmm ? Difficult one because USAF/RAF etc. refuellers are not considered cargo.
I would say....select the cargo category and leave a note to the screeners asking them to delete it if they feel that it is inappropriate.

Will do, thanks Brian :)

RCoulter

10-30-2008, 01:05 PM

Is there any way to add a note to the screeners without having to re-upload and end up farther back in the queue?

ErwinS

10-30-2008, 02:11 PM

IMO Those fire bombers don't qualify as cargo. They are not hauling cargo but a load to drop it somewhere. If we would had a Bomber cat, than you had o select that one;-)

ErwinS

10-30-2008, 02:13 PM

This shot should be Category: Airport - Terminal?
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q130/kanemottohoshi/VVNB-TER.jpg
Rgds,
kanehoshi

I think it will be more a ramp overview. It's surely not an terminal:-)

brianw999

10-30-2008, 02:35 PM

Is there any way to add a note to the screeners without having to re-upload and end up farther back in the queue?

Unfortunately not.

EDIT: You could put a line to that effect in the photographers' notes and hope that the screener sees it. If it's accepted then you could go back to it and delete the note.

RCoulter

10-30-2008, 03:41 PM

Unfortunately not.

EDIT: You could put a line to that effect in the photographers' notes and hope that the screener sees it. If it's accepted then you could go back to it and delete the note.

OK I will do that, thanks again :)

RCoulter

10-30-2008, 04:25 PM

IMO Those fire bombers don't qualify as cargo. They are not hauling cargo but a load to drop it somewhere. If we would had a Bomber cat, than you had o select that one;-)

Now I am confused, since I haven't heard a solid yes or no. I guess I will just uncheck cargo since I also agree that they really aren't cargo planes.

Thanks Erwin :)

yash777

11-03-2008, 06:33 PM

ErwinS

11-03-2008, 06:39 PM

Hey guys i recently got 1 pic accepted without a registration number.

<SCRIPT LANGUAGE='JavaScript' SRC="http://www.jetphotos.net/photolink.php?id=6400848" TYPE='text/javascript'></SCRIPT>

I have another pic of some vintage Mig-23s for which i neither have the registration number nor the C/N.Will they be acceptable?

If those Flogger's don't have any markings on them they will be accepted without a reg nr or c/n. Maybe they a are traceable. On wich location are those MiG's??

yash777

11-04-2008, 09:23 AM

ErwinS

11-04-2008, 01:43 PM

They are located in my university(National aerospace university KhAI).They have some numbers on them but i guess they are the squadron numbers.
Another registration CCCP-67178. Aircraft type LET 410UVP turbojet right? Construction number?

I did a search for those MiG's but I can't find any registration that belongs to them. They will be accepted without registration. If you want to be sure, leave a remark for the screeners that there is no registration on the aircraft.

CCCP-67178 is a LET-410UVP Turbolet with c/n 790214

Rgds,

yash777

11-04-2008, 05:24 PM

I did a search for those MiG's but I can't find any registration that belongs to them. They will be accepted without registration. If you want to be sure, leave a remark for the screeners that there is no registration on the aircraft.

CCCP-67178 is a LET-410UVP Turbolet with c/n 790214

Rgds,

Thanks a lot Erwin.Ill upload em without the registration but ill find em somehow.

turbotraker

11-24-2008, 11:04 PM

can anyone help me identify this visitor to Manchester today? What sort of aircraft is it?

Chaudard

11-24-2008, 11:11 PM

Hello
looks like a Canadair CL-415

Strangely after looking on google, the same reg was a Canadair CL-600 Challenger accidented in 2000. I wonder why they are using the same reg again.

And i found that anyway http://www.ringwayreports.co.uk/ringway.htm

turbotraker

11-24-2008, 11:21 PM

Strangely after looking on google, the same reg was a Canadair CL-600 Challenger accidented in 2000. I wonder why they are using the same reg again.

Cheers Jonathan, that's exactly what I found on google and was surprised the same reg was being used. Thanks

Any way I can find out who was operating this flight?

ErwinS

11-25-2008, 06:43 PM

Cheers Jonathan, that's exactly what I found on google and was surprised the same reg was being used. Thanks

Any way I can find out who was operating this flight?

This CL-415 is on her delivery flight to the Malaysia Maritime Enforcement Agency.

The re-use of a registration is not uncommon with manufacturers. The CL-600 was owned by Bombardier and was test flying for them at the time of the accident.
This CL-415 is using the same reg because it's a Bombardier reg so it can be used over agian since it will be always a temp reg.

Rgds,

turbotraker

11-25-2008, 09:07 PM

This CL-415 is on her delivery flight to the Malaysia Maritime Enforcement Agency.

The re-use of a registration is not uncommon with manufacturers. The CL-600 was owned by Bombardier and was test flying for them at the time of the accident.
This CL-415 is using the same reg because it's a Bombardier reg so it can be used over agian since it will be always a temp reg.

Rgds,

Cheers Erwin, will correct the photo in the queue, just ignore my comments in the 'comments to screeners' section as they will be irrelevant.

Murt

Top_Gun

03-03-2009, 01:33 AM

I have a helo I'm trying to upload but can't find the option.

The Reg is N520WH. According to the FAA site it's a McDonnell Douglas Helicopter, Model 396E. Serial: 288E

Under MD Helicopter I only see MD-530F, well it does look like this.
http://www.mdhelicopters.com/v2/md_530f.php

Any direction on how I can upload this?

thanks

03-03-2009, 04:29 AM

Hi Dave.

The 369E version is in fact the Hughes 369E which late became the MD-500.

As it has the 369E designation on the FAA site please feel free to use the Hughes entry.

http://jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?aircraft=Hughes%20369E

Top_Gun

03-03-2009, 12:57 PM

thanks AJ!

Haendli

03-22-2009, 11:45 PM

On the 20 th of March the atached liitle Bird with the Registration SP-NKK visited Berlin Tegel when taxiing the engine blew off and the plane was then braught to a side place of the airport using 10 fireman towing it. Nobody was injured. I was cuirios what kind of aircraft it is and if anbody knows something about the "strange" Visitor. http://www.ebe-online.de/home/mbaessge/IMG_4028.JPG

Greets and Thank you Haendli

Haendli

03-23-2009, 08:18 AM

By chance i came Across a Photo that looks similar to mine it says Diamond DA-42 Twin Star is mine the same if this is true i would like to put it in my log the fotos are unfortunately to bad quality so i cant upload them. Greets Haendli

03-23-2009, 09:01 AM

SP-NKK is indeed a DA-42, cn is 42.327.

Jose Luis Silva

03-23-2009, 07:46 PM

Hi,

Can you help me with this two aircraft?

The Piper I don't really know which one is it.

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc214/D_icarus_/JETPHOTOS%20ANALISES/IMG_1415.jpg

This one is a Dromadeair...?

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc214/D_icarus_/JETPHOTOS%20ANALISES/IMG_1422.jpg

Thanks in advance.
José Luis

Juulke

03-23-2009, 07:48 PM

PR-LUC (cn 34-49334) Piper Seneca V

PT-WAY Piper PA-36-285 Pawnee Brave (in my opinion;))

Jose Luis Silva

03-23-2009, 08:22 PM

PR-LUC (cn 34-49334) Piper Seneca V

PT-WAY Piper PA-36-285 Pawnee Brave (in my opinion;))

WOOWW two minutes to get a reply!! Thanks a lot Juul.

However can't up-load the photo to database, as "PIPER SENECA V" isn't in the database of aircrafts. I'm correct or not? Thanks a lot!

Jose Luis

arjenp

03-23-2009, 08:38 PM

http://www.jetphotos.net/addphotos/addaircraft.php

Here you can add a aircraft type, you will have to wait untill a admin has approved it. Then you can upload your photo:wink:

Jose Luis Silva

03-23-2009, 09:03 PM

http://www.jetphotos.net/addphotos/addaircraft.php

Here you can add a aircraft type, you will have to wait untill a admin has approved it. Then you can upload your photo:wink:

Thanks a lot!!! Didn't remenber that.

brianw999

03-23-2009, 10:09 PM

Jose...no need to add.

Go to Piper...

PA34.....

PA34-220T Seneca V

EDIT....PT-WAY Piper PA-36-285 Pawnee Brave ? I'd agree with that.

Jose Luis Silva

03-23-2009, 10:43 PM

Jose...no need to add.

Go to Piper...

PA34.....

PA34-220T Seneca V

EDIT....PT-WAY Piper PA-36-285 Pawnee Brave ? I'd agree with that.

Thank you very much Brain, for yr help once again.;-)

Evan Walters

05-10-2009, 07:16 AM

Hi guys,

I have two questions but I think they may tie into each other. The first is regarding the registration of an aircraft and the second is the type of aircraft. The photo in question is of a Republic of Korean Air Force KF-16 (F-16) with a tail number of 93-104.

The Scramble database lists the registration as 93-104 and most of the ROKAF serials follow this format. However, after doing a little more research, I discovered on the F-16net database that the same aircraft is also known as 93-4104 (http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-16/airframe-profile/4309/). Which serial number should I list when downloading and why would it have the second serial?

Secondly, should I list the aircraft manufacturer as Lockheed Martin or Samsung Aerospace? The F-16 was made under licence by Samsung during the early 1990's (http://www.f-16.net/f-16_users_article18.html).

Any help on the format JetPhotos.net use would be most appreciated!

Thanks,

Evan

05-10-2009, 07:51 AM

Evan, please use the Scramble format and Lockheed Martin. Thanks.

Evan Walters

05-10-2009, 12:18 PM

Evan, please use the Scramble format and Lockheed Martin. Thanks.

Thanks for your help AJ!

Evan

mika79

05-16-2009, 05:37 PM

Hi

I need some help. I have uploaded two cockpit shots of planes which did not feature a registration (taken at the AERO 2009). I have them in the queue with the registration and c/n box left empty and airline set to "private".

Is it correct? Or do I need to enter something like "?" or "none" in the registration & s/n box?

Thanks
Michael

LX-A343

05-16-2009, 07:04 PM

If the reg or CN is not known, leave it blank. Things like "?", "***", "UNKNOWN", ... are wrong.

Of course, it would help the screeners if you write some comment in the "remarks to screener" box.

05-16-2009, 10:12 PM

Michael, many of the aircraft you uploaded had easily obtainable CNs. Please try to find them before uploading.

Evan Walters

05-17-2009, 01:59 AM

Evan, please use the Scramble format and Lockheed Martin. Thanks.

AJ, sorry just a quick question regarding the Scramble format. Should the aircraft model be F-16 or KF-16?

Thanks,
Evan

<CENTER><SCRIPT language=JavaScript src="http://www.jetphotos.net/jp_forum_sign.php?photogid=32760" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT></CENTER>

Top_Gun

05-17-2009, 03:42 AM

it would be the F-16D with a CN of KD-24

Evan Walters

05-18-2009, 10:56 AM

it would be the F-16D with a CN of KD-24

Got it. Thanks Dave!

Evan

mika79

08-25-2009, 05:37 AM

ErwinS

08-28-2009, 11:59 AM

Hi

Does anyone know where to find the fleet list of the Malaysian Flying Academy flying school? My search did not yield any results, especially for the registrations 9M-SKE and 9M-SKK.

regards,
Michael

9M-SKE is an Piper PA-28 with cn 28-8316085
and 9M-SKK is an Piper PA-34-220T Seneca III only I can'find the c/n for that one yet.

mika79

09-02-2009, 03:31 PM

Thank you Erwin!

brianw999

09-05-2009, 04:09 AM

This links to the Malaysian Civil Aircraft Register but unfortunately does not give c/n's. You can however find aircraft registered to the Malaysian Flying Academy.

http://www.skmm.gov.my/registers1/aa.asp?cc=2538871581496944306645&vl=&aa=AAAero&fpg=1

kanehoshi

09-27-2009, 01:13 AM

Hello! Yesterday I took photo of B-MAY (Viva Macao) I don't know ex-Airlines, ex reg and c/n ... I alredy try to search by google and airfleet but not in databases. Someone help me!
Rgds,

kanehoshi

09-28-2009, 04:39 AM

AJ , brianw999,LX-A343, and ....... where are you!

ErwinS

09-28-2009, 07:30 PM

Hello! Yesterday I took photo of B-MAY (Viva Macao) I don't know ex-Airlines, ex reg and c/n ... I alredy try to search by google and airfleet but not in databases. Someone help me!
Rgds,

'Maybe a misread for B-MAV?? Otherwise this reg is so new that there is no info yet wich airframe she is. Time will tell.

rgds,

kanehoshi

09-28-2009, 09:31 PM

'Maybe a misread for B-MAV?? Otherwise this reg is so new that there is no info yet wich airframe she is. Time will tell.

rgds,

here you are: B-MAY
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m312/kanehoshi/B-MAY-1.jpg

ErwinS

09-28-2009, 10:13 PM

here you are: B-MAY
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m312/kanehoshi/B-MAY-1.jpg

Hmm right, tricky one. Since she looks dirty and not painted recently my guess is that she is B-MAW but now re-regstered as MAY. Viva only has 2 767's, one 300 model.

Otherwise it is a new airframe but that looks strange since she looks well used allready.

EDIT: The special titles are also seen on B-MAW, so I'm 99 % convinced she was B-MAW but now MAY.

Rgds,

kanehoshi

09-29-2009, 02:54 AM

Hmm right, tricky one. Since she looks dirty and not painted recently my guess is that she is B-MAW but now re-regstered as MAY. Viva only has 2 767's, one 300 model.

Otherwise it is a new airframe but that looks strange since she looks well used allready.

EDIT: The special titles are also seen on B-MAW, so I'm 99 % convinced she was B-MAW but now MAY.

Rgds,
Dear ErwinS,
I just took B-MAW on September 20, 2009 (http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?datesearch=2009-9-20) :

http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m312/kanehoshi/B-MAW.jpg
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6670109&nseq=26

What should I do with: B-MAY?
Rgds,

09-29-2009, 06:34 AM

B-MAY is definately new to the Viva fleet:
http://www.flyvivamacau.com/en/content/index.php?tag=PressRoom_20090923

I am not yet sure of the details. Upload as a 767-300 and leave a note to the screeners.

ErwinS

09-30-2009, 01:25 PM

A well like I said, time will tell.
B-MAY ex N875AW B767-319/ER cn: 24875

rgds,

Evan Walters

10-30-2009, 10:36 PM

Hi,
Should the F-15K's that were built after the Boeing - McDonnell Douglas merger be classified as a Boeing or a McDonnell Douglas F-15K Slam Eagle?
Thanks, Evan

10-31-2009, 01:36 AM

Boeing please Evan.

Evan Walters

10-31-2009, 01:50 AM

Cheers,Thanks AJ.
Evan

mika79

12-01-2009, 06:43 AM

Hi

I'm not sure which aircraft type to choose for the Boeing 747, registration 5U-ACG, serial# 22067, line# 427. I think it is a Boeing 747SR-146B, but I cannot chose this type from the list. Should I add it? Anyway this msn appears as 747-146B in the airframe database on jetphotos, without the SR designation. None of the 747SR models in the list have a trailing -100 designation. Can anyone give me a hint please?

regards
Michael

12-01-2009, 09:11 AM

Hi Michael. Please match the census and make it a 747-146B. There is some doubt as to whether it is an SR or not.

By the way, the SR is on the menu as a 747SR-46.

mika79

12-01-2009, 01:28 PM

Thanks AJ, I did not know that the 747SR is followed by the 2-digit customer code only. I assume there was no 747SR-200 etc.
There is no -146B in the aircraft type list. Do I add it as -146, -146(SUD) or add -146B as a new type?

regards
Michael

12-02-2009, 04:18 AM

Add it please.

HB-IHC

12-05-2009, 01:00 AM

... could the Crew let me know how I should upload an image of The Red Barn (Boeing @ KBFI) in terms of categorical data: Aircraft, Airline, Special Categories etc.

Obviously this is a building of great historical importance and, since I notice that the only image of it on the DB currently was uploaded in 2003, the data looks a little odd and my guess is that a shot like this would require different categorisation today.

Thanks in anticipation

Paul

12-05-2009, 01:15 AM

Please upload it by using KBFI/KBFI in the autofill and select 'Terminal'.
Leave a note to the screeners that I asked you to, then I'll think of something more appropriate.
Thanks.

HB-IHC

12-05-2009, 09:21 AM

Please upload it by using KBFI/KBFI in the autofill and select 'Terminal'.
Leave a note to the screeners that I asked you to, then I'll think of something more appropriate.
Thanks.

Thanks Anthony

aaronacw

12-30-2009, 01:40 AM

Just wondering if anyone would know what type of aircraft this is, If it helps, it is in Datangshan Aviation Museum, China, and has faded US military markings on it
http://s173.photobucket.com/albums/w57/aaronacw/?action=view&current=unknownjettrainer.jpg&newest=1
Thanks in Advance
Aaron

HB-IHC

12-31-2009, 03:51 PM

aaronacw

01-09-2010, 12:43 AM

Thanks so much, I would have never guessed that, but what do I list it as when I post it up?

Thanks
Aaron

HB-IHC

01-09-2010, 09:53 AM

Thanks so much, I would have never guessed that, but what do I list it as when I post it up?
Thanks
Aaron

Personally, I would upload as "Nanchang CJ-6" but perhaps a Crew member could confirm for you?

Paul

01-09-2010, 10:57 AM

Yes, upload it as a Nanchang please.

aaronacw

01-18-2010, 09:59 AM

Thanks very much for clarifying that matter for me

Aaron

turbotraker

02-02-2010, 08:53 PM

Hi, not clued up on business jets, can anyone help me with this aircraft: http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/8328/gmroo.jpg (http://img130.imageshack.us/i/gmroo.jpg/) Tried to put the reg into upload page but didn't come back with the details. Cheers

ErwinS

02-02-2010, 09:53 PM

G-MROO, Cessna 525A Citationjet 2, c/n: 525A-0202

turbotraker

02-02-2010, 11:52 PM

Cheers Erwin.

02-03-2010, 04:13 AM

Murtaza, G-INFO is pure gold:
http://www.caa.co.uk/application.aspx?catid=60&pagetype=65&appid=1

turbotraker

02-03-2010, 10:42 AM

Murtaza, G-INFO is pure gold:
http://www.caa.co.uk/application.aspx?catid=60&pagetype=65&appid=1

Cheers Anthony. Just to clarify, GINFO states its registered to ROONEY AIR LTD, which I couldn't find in drop down. The aircraft has 'Hangar 8' on it's side which in in drop down menu. Which do I use? Murtaza

ErwinS

02-03-2010, 03:44 PM

An unwritten rule is to upload bizjets as Private. Hangar 8 is the operator but I don't know if they are in our dbase.
Private is ok.

turbotraker

02-03-2010, 03:47 PM

An unwritten rule is to upload bizjets as Private.

Ok, will change it.
Thanks

02-03-2010, 07:02 PM

I haven't heard that unwritten rule!

We list by operator whenever possible, in this case Hangar 8:
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?airline=Hangar%208

ErwinS

02-03-2010, 08:20 PM

I haven't heard that unwritten rule!

We list by operator whenever possible, in this case Hangar 8:
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?airline=Hangar%208

Basicly that's what I said. If Hangar 8 is in the dbase use that, otherwise private is fine.

So Hanger 8 is correct:-) Didn't checked our dbase....

What I meant is with the unwritten rule. If no operator is known, or is some kind of LLC or Inc. we use private right?

Just trying to help;-)

turbotraker

02-03-2010, 09:16 PM

Anthony and Erwin, thanks for the help. Will change it to Hanger8. Murtaza

Bertha37

02-05-2010, 06:26 PM

Hi All,

Got some shots of C-GCUH as it arrived at EGCC for a stopover. Now I know its a Canadair CL415 manuf. by Bombardier Inc, but can't find it in any of the registers so don't know who owns it or where its going. Do I upload it as 'private' or does someone know who the owners are or going to be? Military or civilian genre will depend on ownership I suppose.

ErwinS

02-05-2010, 06:49 PM

C-GCUH (c/n:2075) is being delivered to the Croatian AF . Imo you can upload her as Civil and owner Bombardier.

Bertha37

02-05-2010, 06:51 PM

C-GCUH (c/n:2075) is being delivered to the Croatian AF .

Good man! Thank you ;)

turbotraker

02-12-2010, 10:46 AM

C-GCUH (c/n:2075) is being delivered to the Croatian AF . Imo you can upload her as Civil and owner Bombardier.

Would she come under 'cargo'? Murt

ErwinS

02-12-2010, 11:08 AM

No, she is no cargo a/c.

turbotraker

02-12-2010, 05:37 PM

No, she is no cargo a/c.

Ooops, had 2 in the queue, one ticked as cargo, one not. Cannot change now as its 'in screening'.
Murt

ErwinS

02-13-2010, 08:26 PM

Saw them accepted, nice shots:-)

turbotraker

02-15-2010, 04:07 PM

Saw them accepted, nice shots:-)

Cheers ErwinS, much appreciated. Murt

biggerben

03-15-2010, 07:41 AM

Last night I missed this post and opened a new one here:
http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=49891 , where Gerardo claims it's a Bombardier CRJ-200ER.

Now, I hate to question him, but in one of my very infrequent A.net visits I found they claim it's a Canadair CL-600-2B19 Challenger 850.

Who is right?

Also, this is a night shot, right?

ErwinS

03-15-2010, 08:14 AM

Both are right, the Challenger 850 is basicly a CRJ-200ER but instead of an airliner she is a bizzer.

CL-600-2B19 is the standard type designation, Challenger 850 is the name to promote her a a bizjet, kind of an enlarged Challenger. CRJ-200 defines the airline type.

We have the Challenger 850 in our dbase
http://jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?aircraft=Bombardier%20CL-600-2B19%20Challenger%20850

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_Challenger_850