Rejects...

[Legend_Airlines]

Is this (http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=16993) really too far away?
Let's compare it with this (http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=14822)...


And is this (http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=16982) very blurry? The aircraft isn't blurry. I'd like to see you get a picture like that through a fence! uhoh.gif

PS: UBB Code sucks!

<FONT COLOR="black" SIZE="1">[ January 05, 2003 10:32 PM: Message edited 1 time, lastly by Ian Duke ]</font>

[PolishAir42]

I rejected the 1st one for being too far away,

I did not screen the 2 last ones you posted

Photo #2 would have been rejected by me because its too far off also.

Photo #3 Bit overexposed aint it? err id say borderline

[cicadajet]

Ian, the first one *is* rather far off... Wasim's shot is aviation related in the foreground and perhaps that was the determining factor to the screener (but its not fair I don't think to pick on someone else's shot).

The second one is obviously not shot on a very good day weather-wise to get a good image. The fuselage in blending into the sky behind it..and its off-center (without discernable motivation).

I'm sure you'll upload better ones for us to see soon.

Tom
(*not* a screener).

[Chris Kilroy]

Photo #1 - I agree, too far away.

Photo #2 - Also far away, but an interesting perspective with the terminal and other aircraft around. Borderline, but I would've accepted it.

Photo #3 - A bit blurry, but my main beef had I screened it would have been that the aircraft was off-center. I just don't feel that the shot is asthetically pleasing.

As a rule of thumb, if a photo depicts a straight-on side view of an aircraft, and you can't make out the registration, it's likely a) too far away, b) too blurry, or c) too grainy for acceptance into the database.

[Legend_Airlines]

thanks for the great input!

http://www.ianduke.com/images/MYT330 -2.jpg
it's centered, but is it aesthetically pleasing?

<FONT COLOR="black" SIZE="1">[ January 06, 2003 06:26 PM: Message edited 1 time, lastly by Ian Duke ]</font>

[PolishAir42]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Chris Kilroy:
Photo #1 - I agree, too far away.

Photo #2 - Also far away, but an interesting perspective with the terminal and other aircraft around. Borderline, but I would've accepted it.

Photo #3 - A bit blurry, but my main beef had I screened it would have been that the aircraft was off-center. I just don't feel that the shot is asthetically pleasing.

As a rule of thumb, if a photo depicts a straight-on side view of an aircraft, and you can't make out the registration, it's likely a) too far away, b) too blurry, or c) too grainy for acceptance into the database.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Gee I wonder who you ripped that rule of thumb thing off of ahhaha... skeptical.gif

Ian, Chris is right though, if you cant see the registration on a side shot in daylight in a typical shot like that then i doubt it will be accepted.

[Legend_Airlines]

idea.gif sledgehammer the scanner! and it rhymes, too!